Skip to main content

Table 3 Between-group difference in the FES-I scores

From: Cross-cultural adaptation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International for community-dwelling elderly individuals

Variable

N (%)

Mean ± standard deviation

Median (IQR)

P value

Effect size

All participants

135

26.0 ± 9.5

23 (13)

  

Demographic characteristics

 Age

   

0.02

0.73

   < 80 years old

116 (86.0%)

25.1 ± 8.5

23 (12)

  

   ≥ 80 years old

19 (14.4%)

32.0 ± 12.5

31 (22)

  

 Sex

   

0.10

0.18

  Men

39 (28.9%)

24.8 ± 10.2

22 (12)

  

  Women

96 (71.1%)

26.5 ± 9.1

24 (12)

  

 Use of walking aids

   

 < 0.001

1.63

  No

127 (94.1%)

25.1 ± 8.8

23 (12)

  

  Yes

8 (5.9%)

40.5 ± 8.7

37.5 (13.3)

  

 Living alone

   

0.20

0.28

  No

99 (73.3%)

25.3 ± 9.0

23 (12)

  

  Yes

36 (26.7%)

28.0 ± 10.6

28 (16.3)

  

Falling risk factors

 Falls in the past one year

  

 < 0.001

0.53

  None

107 (79.3%)

25.0 ± 9.1

23 (13)

  

  Any falls

28 (20.7%)

30.0 ± 10.0

29 (14.8)

  

 Multiple falls in the past one year

  

 < 0.001

1.51

  No

126 (93.3%)

25.1 ± 8.7

23 (12)

  

  Yes

9 (6.7%)

39.4 ± 9.3

38 (16)

  

 Fear of fall

   

 < 0.001

0.87

  No

68 (50.4%)

22.2 ± 8.1

18.5 (9.8)

  

  Yes

67 (49.6%)

30.3 ± 9.2

29 (12)

  

Physical functional tests

 Timed up and go

   

0.67

0.32

  No risk

126 (93.3%)

25.8 ± 9.2

23 (12)

  

  At risk of falling

9 (6.7%)

28.9 ± 12.9

31 (22)

  

 4-stage balance test

   

0.09

1.12

  No risk

130 (94.8%)

25.6 ± 9.1

23 (12)

  

  At risk of falling

5 (5.2%)

36.2 ± 14.2

35 (26)

  

 30 s chair stand test

  

0.76

0.003

     No risk

126 (93.3%)

26.0 ± 9.6

23 (13)

  

  At risk of falling

9 (6.7%)

26.0 ± 7.7

25 (13)

 Â