Skip to main content

Table 3 Cumulative odds ratios (CORs) (95% confidence intervals in parenthesis) from the fitted proportional odds (PO) models for loneliness and anxiety among Home Care Service (HCS) and Residential Care Facility (RCF) respondents

From: Anxiety and loneliness among older people living in residential care facilities or receiving home care services in Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional study

Effects

Anxiety (Response order: Severe < Slight < None)

Loneliness (Response order:

Often < Sometimes < Never)

HCS

RCF

HCS

RCF

Age (ref: < 80 years)

    

Older than 80 years

0.81

(0.78, 0.84)

0.88

(0.83, 0.94)

1.03ns

(0.99,1.06)

1.14

(1.07, 1.22)

Sex (ref.: male)

    

Female

1.44

(1.39, 1.49)

1.38

(1.30, 1.45)

1.19

(1.15, 1.23)

1.11

(1.05, 1.17)

Dementia (ref.: no dementia)

    

Persons with dementia

1.26

(1.19, 1.33)

1.35

(1.26, 1.43)

1.43

(1.35,1.51)

1.18

(1.10, 1.26)

Self-rated health (ref.: not poor)

    

Poor or very poor

3.89

(3.74, 4.04)

3.93

(3.70, 4.10)

2.23

(2.15, 2.31)

2.22

(2.09, 2.35)

Household status (ref.: living with an adult)

    

Living alone

1.05

(1.01, 1.08)

 

3.86

(3.71, 4.01)

 

Disrespect (ref.: experienced)

    

No experience of disrespect

1.60

(1.54, 1.67)

2.17

(2.04, 2.30)

1.62

(1.55, 1.68)

3.17

(2.98, 3.38)

Mobility (ref.: Can move alone)

    

Unable to move unaided or great difficulty in moving

1.32

(1.27, 1.36)

1.02ns

(0.96, 1.09)

1.33

(1.28, 1.37)

1.27

(1.18,1.36)

Survey responder (ref.: self)

    

With the help of (or by) a proxy

1.48

(1.43, 1.53)

1.49

(1.42, 1.57)

1.67

(1.62, 1.73)

1.55

(1.46, 1.63)

log (COVID-19 infection in the last 2 weeks/100 th. population)

1.06

(1.04, 1.08)

1.04

(1.01, 1.07)

1.13

(1.11, 1.15)

1.15

(1.12, 1.18)

Region (21 counties in Sweden; dummy variable)1

Yes

Yesns

Yes

Yes

  1. Notes: 120 dummy variables for 21 Swedish regions were included (one less due to identifiability), but all the 20 region effects are not reported to keep the table short. nsNot significant at 5% significance level. A COR of > 1 indicated higher odds of answering towards a lower response category for an increase in the effect variable, and vice versa