Skip to main content

Table 1 Participant Characteristics

From: The impact of facility-based transitional care programs on function and discharge destination for older adults with cognitive impairment: a systematic review

Author Year

Number of patients

How CI was defined

Age (years) mean ± SD

Females

n (%)

Ethnicity

%

Cognitive Status Score

Mean ± SD

Charlson Comorbidity Index Score mean ± SD

Abrahamsen 2016 [60]

Number of patients with an MMSE < 24: 206 (29% of total participants)

CI defined using the Norwegian version of the MMSE (score range 0–30, score < 24 is a sign of cognitive impairment)

Mean age of total sample 85, min–max (70–102)

Of total sample:

n = 656 (68)

NR

Median MMSE of total sample: 26, min–max (8–30)

Of total sample: > 5 diagnoses, n(%) 567(62)

Bardenheier 2021 [54]

Total number of persons with ADRD:

n = 2,134,798

ADRD was identified by the (CCW) flag in the Medicare beneficiary summary file

January 1 to September 30, 2015: mean age 84.6

January 1 to September 30, 2015:

141,475(64.9)

January 1 to September 30, 2015

Black % 8.6

Other race % 4.6

NR

NR

Burke 2021 [51]

Total number with dementia: 830,524 (34.3%)

With dementia, used in matched cohort: 513,424 (34.3%)

Identification of dementia determined via coding in datasets (MDS, MBSF, MedPAR)

82.8 (8.1)

320,611 (62.4%)

White: 446,090 (86.9%)

Black: 46,606 (9.1%)

Asian: 5976 (1.2%)

Other: 5059 (1.0%)

Hispanic: 7951 (1.5%)

CFS:

Cognitively intact: 260,736 (50.8%)

Mild impairment: 180,667 (35.2%)

Moderate impairment:

61,041 (11.9%)

Severe impairment: 10,980 (2.1%)

3.0 (2.4)

Cations 2020 [38]

Individuals in residential care settings with dementia: n = 10,701 (25.4%)

Dementia was determined from the aged care eligibility assessment and dispensing of medications prescribed for Alzheimer’s disease in the 6 months before hospitalization

For all participants in residential TCP: 83.2(7.3)

For all participants in residential TCP: 25,999(61.7)

NR

NR

For all participants in residential TCP:

Comorbidities (median, IQR) 0: 1948 (4.6)

1–4: 15,336 (36.4)

5–9: 21,971 (51.1)

10 + : 9210 (6.90)

Chong 2012 [61]

Persons with dementia and behavioural disturbances:

n = 31 (16.9%)

Dementia not defined

For all participants:

81.1 (± 8.1)

For all participants:

100 (54.6)

For all participants:

Chinese 83.6%; Malay 8.2%; Indian 7.1%; Others 1.2%

NR

For all participants:

Modified CCI 1.6 ± 1.3; Severity of illness score index 2.0 ± 0.7

Downer 2022 [46]

Mild CI: n = 120,830

Moderate to severe CI: n = 74,183

Cognitive status was categorized as none, mild, and moderate or severe impairment according to the Cognitive Function Scale

For total sample: n(%)

Age 66–70: 73,721 (12.0); Age 71–75: 99,050 (16.1); Age 76–80: 116,526 (18.9); Age 81–85: 124,364 (20.2); Age ≥ 86: 202,412 (32.9)

For total sample:

394,629 (64.1)

For total sample:

White 86.0%

Black 7.1%

Hispanic 3.6%

Other 3.3%

For total sample:

CI: n (%)

None 421,060 (68.3)

Mild 120,830 (19.6)

Moderate to severe

74,183 (12.0)

NR

Hang 2021 [19]

CI: n = 73

CI measured using Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), scored ≤ 23/30 at admission

For all participants:

84.2 ± 8.3

For all participants:

103 (60.9)

NR

MMSE

Discharged Home n(%) vs Other n(%)

Yes 21 (42.9), 66 (63.5) p = 0.016*

For all participants:

NR

Intrator 2021 [47]

With dementia: n = 1091

No/mild CI: n = 9808

Moderate/high CI: n = 4979

Dementia status from the MDS assessment at the start of the CLC episode, MDS item I4800; Cognitive function status from MDS items B0700, C0100, C0500, C1000

With dementia: 77.99 (10.53)

No/mild CI: 68.00 (10.87)

Moderate/high CI: 72.79 (11.68)

With dementia:

1.7%

With dementia and No/Mild CI: 2.0%

With dementia and moderate/high CI: 1.7%

With no dementia: 4.3%

With no dementia and No/Mild CI: 4.8%

With no dementia and moderate/high CI: 3.4%

%Female among Veterans in cohort with no/mild CI: 4.7%

%Female among Veterans in cohort with moderate/high CI: 3.0%

Overall %Female in this cohort was 4.1%

American Indian or Alaska Native

With dementia: 0.53%; No/mild CI: 0.86%; Moderate/high CI: 1.12%

Asian: With dementia: 0.27%

No/mild CI: 0.33%

Moderate/high CI: 0.25%

Black / African American: With dementia:: 21.26%; No/mild CI: 18.70%; Moderate/high CI: 20.69%

Hispanic or Latino: With dementia: 5.67%; No/mild CI: 4.02%;

Moderate/high CI: 4.25%

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander: With dementia: 0.27%; No/mild CI: 0.49%;

Moderate/high CI: 0.52%

White: With dementia: 71.74%;

No/mild CI: 75.52%; Moderate/high CI: 73.00%

Unknown: With dementia: 0.27%;

No/mild CI: 0.09%;

Moderate/high CI: 0.15%

No/mild CI:

n = 9808

Moderate/high CI: n = 4979

With dementia: 1.66 (SD 0.31)

No/mild CI: 1.73 (SD 0.20)

Moderate/high CI: 1.70 (SD 0.24)

Kosar 2017 [55]

Participants with delirium:

n = 242,121

Delirium identified using the CAM criteria in the MDS resident assessment; Dementia status from the MDS admission assessment

83.2 (8.1)

141,451 (58)

non-white race 16%

CFS Score n (%):

mild impairment 45,240 (19); moderate impairment 132,759 (55); severe impairment 43,844 (18)

dementia n (%): 133,496 (55)

CCI score: 2.6 (2.0)

Lee 2008 [58]

Number of participants with CI not reported

CI measured by 7-category MDS CPS

For all participants:

82.34 ± 7.7 (range 65–102)

For all participants:

67%

NR

For all participants:

1.68(1.7) range 0–6

NR

Lee 2011 [29]

Participants with dementia: n = 139

Dementia defined as MMSE < 14 with education years < 6 years; MMSE < 24 with education years ≥ 6 years

82.6 ± 5.9

0 (0%)

(All participants were male)

NR

MMSE score 5.9 ± 3.7

NR

Lei 2022 [48]

Veterans with dementia in PAC n = 8317

Dementia identified via ICD-9 coding

Aged 66–74: 16.9%

Aged 75–84: 42.4%

Aged 85 + : 40.7%

166 (2%)

Non-Hispanic white 76.7%

NR

NR

Loomer 2019 [44]

Participants with mild CI n = 45,064; Moderate CI n = 28,979; Severe CI n = 4117; Total number of participants with CI: n = 78,160

CI defined using the CFS in the MDS v.3.0; Alzheimer’s disease/dementia identified if it was an admission diagnosis

Ages 65–74 n (%)

mild CI 8976 (19.9); moderate CI 3976(13.7); severe CI 728 (17.7);

ages 75–84 n (%)

mild CI 15,246 (33.8); moderate CI 9358 (32.3); severe CI 1395 (33.8); ages 85–90 n (%)

mild CI 9485 (21.1); moderate CI 7147 (24.7); severe CI 750 (18.2); 90 + years n (%)

mild CI 8598 (19.1); moderate CI 7241(25.0); severe CI 778 (18.9)

NR

NR

Alzheimer’s Disease/Dementia n (%)

Among participants with mild CI 10,941 (24.3)

Among participants with moderate CI 17,191 (59.3)

Among participants with severe CI 2670 (64.9)

NR

Lueckel 2018 [62]

n (%) Participants with mild CI n = 22,043 (25); Moderate CI: n = 20,282 (23); Severe CI: n = 5144 (6)

CI defined using the CFS

For all participants:

83.9(7.5)

For all participants:

55,418(63)

For all participants:

Nonwhite race (9)

CFS Score, n (%)

2: Mild impairment 22,043 (25); 3: Moderate impairment 20,282 (23); 4: Severe impairment 5,144 (6)

For all participants: Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index, mean (SD) 1.2 (1.4)

Madrigal 2021 [42]

Participants with delirium: n = 882

Delirium determined using the MDS 3.0 CAM; dementia determined via ICD-9 coding

81.0(9.3) P < 0.001

n = 31(3.5)

n (%)

White: 710 (80.5)

Black: 138(15.6)

Hispanic 145(1.6)

Other: 20(2.3)

Dementia, n (%): 525 (59.5)

Elixhauser comorbidity index, mean (SD) 4.3(2.8)

Marcantonio 2003 [45]

Participants with delirium symptoms:

n = 126

Delirium assessed in the MDS; dementia assessed in MDS from the list of MDS-based comorbidities

Participants with delirium symptoms:

79 ± 8

Participants with delirium symptoms:

77(61)

Participants with delirium symptoms:

Caucasian, 111 (88)

Participants with delirium symptoms:

Dementia diagnosis (n (%)): 18 (14)

Participants with delirium symptoms:

2.1 ± 1.0

Marcantonio 2005 [63]

Participants with delirium: n = 188;

Participants with subsyndromal delirium: n = 246;

Total number of persons with CI: n = 434

Participants classified as having delirium if they met full CAM criteria; classified as having subsyndromal delirium if they have one or more CAM criteria

Participants with delirium: 83.3 ± 7.4

Participants with subsyndromal delirium:

82.5 ± 7.7

Participants with delirium: 127 (68)

Participants with subsyndromal delirium:

167 (68)

Participants with delirium:

White, not Hispanic:

146 (87)

Participants with subsyndromal delirium:

White, not Hispanic:

143 (89)

Participants with delirium:

MMSE score 12.7 ± 7.0; MDAS score:

12.6 ± 4.4

Participants with subsyndromal delirium:

MMSE score 18.8 ± 6.1; MDAS score:

7.1 ± 3.1

Participants with delirium:

CCI score: 1.2 ± 1.2

Participants with subsyndromal delirium:

CCI score: 1.4 ± 1.3

Mazzola 2022 [59]

With dementia: n = 98

With delirium: n = 58

Dementia via history of pre-existing dementia and using the MMSE. Delirium was assessed with the 4AT test

For whole sample: 78.2 (11.6)

For whole sample:

202 (49.7%)

NR

Mini-Mental State Examination

Mean (SD) 21.3 (7.5)

For whole sample: 3.0 (1.9)

Miu 2016 [30]

Community-dwelling participants with CI: n = 78; with dementia: n = 31

CI was determined using the MMSE; delirium via the CAM-CR; dementia identified through medical records

Community-dwelling participants with cognitive impairment:

83.9 ± 6.5; with dementia: 84.2 ± 6.6

Community-dwelling participants with cognitive impairment:

42(54); with dementia: 19(61)

NR

NR

Community-dwelling participants with CI: mean CCI = 2.36 ± 1.55; with dementia: mean CCI = 2.52 ± 1.23

Nakanishi 2016 [56]

Participants who had dementia:

n = 2483

Dementia diagnosis was determined through the ICD-10

For total sample, based on discharge destination:

home: 84 ± 8.3

hospital: 85.2 ± 8.2

Facility: 84.1 ± 8.2

Death: 88.6 ± 7.4

For total sample, based on discharge destination:

sex, male, n (%)

home: 763(26.3)

hospital: 1453 (32.8)

facility: 538 (26.0)

death: 193 (32.6)

NR

Cognitive impairmenta (range 1–6), mean ± SD

For total sample,

Based on discharge destination:

home: 2.6 ± 1.4

hospital: 3.0 ± 1.1

facility: 2.8 ± 1.2

death: 3.2 ± 1.0

NR

Simning 2022 [52]

With dementia: n = 10,426

Dementia determined through SNF admission MDS and ICD-9 codes

Discharged home: 81.7 ± 8.5

Not discharged home: 83.0 ± 89.0

Discharged home: 66.40%

Not discharged home: 60.90%

Discharged home: White: 84.10%

Not discharged home: White: 79.3%

Discharged home: % with dementia: 16.20%

Not discharged home % with dementia: 31.9%

Discharged home: Number of diagnoses: 6 ± 3.7

Not discharged home: Number of diagnoses: 5.9 ± 3.6

Wysocki 2015 [57]

Moderately

impaired (19.3%) n = 171,152 Severely impaired (9.7%) n = 86,019

Dementia 12.9%) n = 114,396; Any signs of delirium: = 25,717

CI defined using the CPS; Dementia determined if participant had a diagnosis of dementia;

Signs of delirium were based on the CAM items

Mean age of total sample: 77.4 ± 12.3

NR for patients with CI or dementia

For total sample: 64.4%

NR for patients with CI or dementia

Race, not white for total sample 15.8%

NR for patients with CI or dementia

For whole sample:

% with Dementia: 12.9; % with moderately impaired cognition for whole sample: 19.3; % with severely impaired cognition for whole sample: 2.9; % with Alzheimer’s disease for whole sample: 2.9

NR

  1. Results are for persons with CI (CI, dementia, delirium) only, unless otherwise stated
  2. CI Cognitive impairment, N Number, ADRD Alzheimer's Disease and related dementias, MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination, CCI Charlson Comorbidity Index, MDAS Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale, IQR Interquartile range, NR Not reported, CLC Community Living Center, CFS Cognitive Function Scale, CI Cognitive impairment, CCW Chronic Condition Data Warehouse, CAM Confusion Assessment Method, MDS Minimum Data Set, ICD-9 International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, CAM-CR Chinese version of the CAM, ICD-10 International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision, SPMSQ Short portable mental status questionnaire, CPS Cognitive Performance Scale, MBSF Master Beneficiary Summary File, SD Standard deviation
  3. a Cognitive impairment scale not specified, however, authors report that it demonstrates consistency with scores on the MMSE and Hasegawa Dementia Scale-Revised