Skip to main content

Table 3 Reliability and validation tests of CFS-C

From: Validation of clinical frailty scale in Chinese translation

Tests

N

Weighted kappa

p-value

Kendall’s tau

p-value

Inter-rater reliability

 Physicians vs. research assistant

52

0.60

 < .0001

0.67

 < .0001

Criterion concurrent validity

 CFS-C categorisationa vs. Fried frailty phenotype

213

0.37

 < .0001

0.46

 < .0001

 CFS-C vs. FI-CGA

214

-

-

0.64

 < .0001

 CFS-C categorisationa vs. FI-CGA categorisationb

214

0.51

 < .0001

0.63

 < .0001

  1. Abbreviations: CFS-C Chinese version of Clinical Frailty Scale, FI-CGA Frailty Index based on a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment
  2. a Robust: CFS-C 1–2, prefrail: CFS-C 3–4, frail: CFS-C 5–7
  3. b Robust: FI-CGA ≤ 0.08, prefrail: 0.08 < FI-CGA < 0.25, frail: FI-CGA ≥ 0.25