Skip to main content

Table 8 Association between E1 and gait speed in male and female

From: Evaluating the discriminatory power of the velocity field diagram and timed-up-and-go test in determining the fall status of community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional observational study

 

Models with E1 as a continuous variable

Men

β*

(SE)

P value

 

Women

β*

(SE)

P value

 

Model 1

 

-0.038 (0.015)

0.017*

  

-0.019 (0.017)

0.172

 

Model 2

 

-0.038 (0.017)

0.015*

  

-0.016 (0.016)

0.278

 

Model 3

 

-0.046 (0.018)

0.013*

  

-0.014 (0.018)

0.372

 

Model 4

 

-0.049 (0.017)

0.011*

  

-0.019 (0.014)

0.369

 
 

Models with E1 by increasing quartiles

 

Men

Women

 

Quartile comparison

β†

(SE)

P value

P for trend

Quartile comparison

β†

(SE)

P value

P for trend

Model 1

Q2 v.s. Q1

-0.017 (0.037)

0.638

0.038*

Q2 v.s. Q1

0.049 (0.027)

0.092

0.464

 

Q3 v.s. Q1

-0.064 (0.048)

0.146

 

Q3 v.s. Q1

-0.032 (0.031)

0.335

 
 

Q4 v.s. Q1

-0.078 (0.033)

0.078

 

Q4 v.s. Q1

-0.001 (0.035)

0.978

 

Model 2

Q2 v.s. Q1

-0.011 (0.055)

0.790

0.056

Q2 v.s. Q1

0.052 (0.027)

0.075

0.531

 

Q3 v.s. Q1

-0.059 (0.039)

0.197

 

Q3 v.s. Q1

-0.025 (0.030)

0.403

 
 

Q4 v.s. Q1

-0.058 (0.034)

0.078

 

Q4 v.s. Q1

0.006 (0.038)

0.908

 

Model 3

Q2 v.s. Q1

-0.015 (0.029)

0.567

0.024*

Q2 v.s. Q1

0.058 (0.029)

0.048*

0.705

 

Q3 v.s. Q1

-0.046 (0.031)

0.120

 

Q3 v.s. Q1

-0.022 (0.033)

0.508

 
 

Q4 v.s. Q1

-0.072 (0.035)

0.030*

 

Q4 v.s. Q1

0.016 (0.037)

0.707

 

Model 4

Q2 v.s. Q1

-0.008 (0.036)

0.786

0.019*

Q2 v.s. Q1

0.052 (0.029)

0.059

0.673

 

Q3 v.s. Q1

-0.048 (0.038)

0.167

 

Q3 v.s. Q1

-0.022 (0.031)

0.565

 
 

Q4 v.s. Q1

-0.063 (0.023)

0.024*

 

Q4 v.s. Q1

0.009 (0.036)

0.809

 

E1

Men

   

Women

Mean Difference

P-value

 

Overall Mean

3.75 ± 1.37

   

3.50 ± 1.25

0.25

0.044*

 
  1. * Indicates p ≤ 0.05,
  2. Adjusted covariates: Model 1 = Age, weight, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and use of walking devices; Model 2 = Model 1 + co-morbidities (dizziness, vestibular diseases, diabetes, and arthritis)
  3. Model 3 = Model 2 + markers of cardiovascular risk (natural-log-transformed levels of the use of anti-anxiety drugs, gender)
  4. Model 4 = Model 3 + BMI categories
  5. * Parameter estimates (β) can be interpreted as differences in mean gait speed (m/sec) for each increment
  6. of one standard deviation in the log-transformed E1 among men (or women)
  7. † Parameter estimates (β) can be interpreted as differences in mean gait speed (m/sec) compared male (or female)
  8. subjects in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartiles of E1 to those in the lowest quartile
  9. Abbreviations: E1 – Equality point for the regression lines of velocity and stride frequency on the VFD; SE, standard error
  10. The cut-off values E1 quartiles among the men were: quartile 1 (< 1.80), quartile 2 (1.80–2.51), quartile 3 (2.52–3.69),
  11. and quartile 4 (> 3.69); while among the women the cut-off values were: quartile 1 (< 1.48), quartile 2 (1.48–2.28),
  12. quartile 3 (2.29–3.52), and quartile 4 (> 3.52)