Skip to main content

Table 4 Bivariate logistic regressions for the level of participation for the comparison group, using “participate as much as I want” as the reference category and each independent variable treated separately

From: Associations between community participation and types of places visited among persons living with and without dementia: risks perception and socio-demographic aspects

Comparison group

Independent variable

Do participate (3)

Nagelkerke R2

p-value

OR

CI 95%

p-value

Risks

 Getting lost (ref: very unconcerned (4))

 

(a)

(a)

  Unconcerned (3)

(a)

(a)

(a)

  

 Falling down (ref: very unconcerned (4))

 

.199

.109

  Concerned (2)

(a)

(a)

(a)

  

  Unconcerned (3)

5.43

.81–36.51

.082

  

 Stress (ref: very unconcerned (4))

 

.218

.086

  Concerned (2)

(a)

(a)

(a)

  

  Unconcerned (3)

8.00

1.08–59.14

.042

  

 Embarrassment (ref: very unconcerned (4))

 

.057

.544

  Concerned (2)

(a)

(a)

(a)

  

  Unconcerned (3)

2.50

.19–33.17

.487

  

Socio-demographic

 Age

1.08

.96–1.23

.212

.080

.191

 Gender (ref: female (2))

2.22

.37–13.22

.380

.036

.383

 Living situation (ref: with someone (2))

.25

.03–2.38

.246

.084

.178

 Access to car (ref: someone else drives (2))

 

.003

.971

  Not a car user (0)

.83

.04–16.99

.906

  

 Car user – self-driving (1)

1.11

.10–12.31

.932

  

 Setting (ref: big city (2))

 

.038

.666

  Rural (0)

2.73

.24–30.66

.416

  

  Small town (1)

2.50

.19–32.80

.485

  

Places visited

 Total number of places visited

.83

.64–1.08

.172

.090

.164

 Total places visited in A

.79

.41–1.51

.476

.022

.493

 Total places visited in B

2.24

.52–9.72

.281

.061

.252

 Total places visited in C

1.34

.62–2.91

.462

.027

.446

 Total places visited in D

.44

.23–.85

.015

.331

.005

  1. aNot enough participants in this category to get results