Skip to main content

Table 4 Bivariate logistic regressions for the level of participation for the comparison group, using “participate as much as I want” as the reference category and each independent variable treated separately

From: Associations between community participation and types of places visited among persons living with and without dementia: risks perception and socio-demographic aspects

Comparison group
Independent variable Do participate (3) Nagelkerke R2 p-value
OR CI 95% p-value
Risks
 Getting lost (ref: very unconcerned (4))   (a) (a)
  Unconcerned (3) (a) (a) (a)   
 Falling down (ref: very unconcerned (4))   .199 .109
  Concerned (2) (a) (a) (a)   
  Unconcerned (3) 5.43 .81–36.51 .082   
 Stress (ref: very unconcerned (4))   .218 .086
  Concerned (2) (a) (a) (a)   
  Unconcerned (3) 8.00 1.08–59.14 .042   
 Embarrassment (ref: very unconcerned (4))   .057 .544
  Concerned (2) (a) (a) (a)   
  Unconcerned (3) 2.50 .19–33.17 .487   
Socio-demographic
 Age 1.08 .96–1.23 .212 .080 .191
 Gender (ref: female (2)) 2.22 .37–13.22 .380 .036 .383
 Living situation (ref: with someone (2)) .25 .03–2.38 .246 .084 .178
 Access to car (ref: someone else drives (2))   .003 .971
  Not a car user (0) .83 .04–16.99 .906   
 Car user – self-driving (1) 1.11 .10–12.31 .932   
 Setting (ref: big city (2))   .038 .666
  Rural (0) 2.73 .24–30.66 .416   
  Small town (1) 2.50 .19–32.80 .485   
Places visited
 Total number of places visited .83 .64–1.08 .172 .090 .164
 Total places visited in A .79 .41–1.51 .476 .022 .493
 Total places visited in B 2.24 .52–9.72 .281 .061 .252
 Total places visited in C 1.34 .62–2.91 .462 .027 .446
 Total places visited in D .44 .23–.85 .015 .331 .005
  1. aNot enough participants in this category to get results