Skip to main content

Table 3 Association between ACEs and LMS in the overall population and different sex groups in logistic regression models

From: Adverse childhood experiences and handgrip strength among middle-aged and older adults: a cross-sectional study in China

 

Overalld

N = 7209

Mend

N = 3396

Womend

N = 3813

Model 1a

OR (95% CI)

 ACEs

  0

ref

ref

ref

  1

1.11 (0.92, 1.34)

1.24 (0.93, 1.67)

1.04 (0.81, 1.32)

  2

1.11 (0.91, 1.35)

1.18 (0.87, 1.60)

1.07 (0.83, 1.39)

  ≥ 3

1.44 (1.21, 1.72)

1.56 (1.18, 2.05)

1.37 (1.09, 1.73)

  p for trend

 < 0.001

0.002

0.004

Model 2b

 ACEs

  0

ref

ref

ref

  1

1.10 (0.91, 1.33)

1.24 (0.92, 1.67)

1.03 (0.81, 1.32)

  2

1.10 (0.90, 1.34)

1.18 (0.87, 1.61)

1.07 (0.83, 1.38)

  ≥ 3

1.41 (1.18, 1.68)

1.54 (1.17, 2.03)

1.35 (1.07, 1.70)

  p for trend

 < 0.001

0.002

0.007

Model 3c

 ACEs

  0

ref

ref

ref

  1

1.10 (0.91, 1.33)

1.27 (0.94, 1.72)

1.03 (0.80, 1.31)

  2

1.08 (0.89, 1.32)

1.17 (0.86, 1.60)

1.05 (0.81, 1.36)

  ≥ 3

1.34 (1.12, 1.61)

1.48 (1.11, 1.96)

1.30 (1.02, 1.64)

  p for trend

0.001

0.011

0.023

  1. ACE adverse childhood experience, CI confidence interval, LMS low muscle strength, OR odds ratio
  2. aModel 1: Adjusted for age and sex in the overall population, and adjusted for age in different sex groups
  3. bModel 2: Additionally adjusted for marital status, ethnicity, and area of residence
  4. cModel 3: Additionally adjusted for smoking and drinking status, BMI, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, DM, CVD, arthritis, hip fracture, and memory-related disease
  5. dIn the overall population, the prevalence of LMS was 17.1%, 19.1%, 19.2%, and 24.9% in the groups with 0, 1, 2, and ≥ 3 ACEs. In men, the prevalence of LMS was 16.2%, 19.0%, 18.8%, and 24.8% in the groups with 0, 1, 2, and ≥ 3 ACEs. In women, the prevalence of LMS was 17.8%, 19.2%, 19.6%, and 25.1% in the groups with 0, 1, 2, and ≥ 3 ACEs