Table 2 Comparison of posterior probability of assignment for the single mobility model, the single fatigability model and the trajectory model that jointly modelled mobility and fatigability
A. Fatigability given mobility trajectory: posterior probability of assignment | ||||
| Â | Fatigability trajectory groups | |||
| Â | Stable low (n=5) | Improving (n=19) | Stable high (n=20) | |
Mobility trajectory groups | Â | Â | Â | |
Low (n=15) | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.95 | |
High (n=29) | 0.16 | 0.66 | 0.17 | |
B. Mobility given fatigability trajectory: posterior probability of assignment | ||||
| Â | Mobility trajectory groups | Â | ||
| Â | Low (n=15) | High (n=29) | Â | |
Fatigability trajectory groups | Â | Â | Â | |
Stable low (n=5) | 0.15 | 0.86 | Â | |
Improving (n=19) | 0.00 | 1.00 | Â | |
Stable high (n=20) | 0.74 | 0.26 | Â | |
C. Joint fatigability mobility model: posterior probability of assignment | ||||
Group Allocation | N (%) | Low fatigability high mobility | Improving fatigability high mobility | High fatigability low mobility |
Low fatigability high mobility | 5 (11) | 0.79 | 0.03 | <0.001 |
Improving fatigability high mobility | 23(52) | 0.06 | 0.79 | 0.01 |
High fatigability low mobility | 16 (36) | <0.001 | 0.01 | 0.86 |