Skip to main content

Table 5 Adjusted odds ratios (and 95% confidence intervals) of physical activity and poor SRH, AOR(95%CI)

From: Associations of fruit & vegetable intake and physical activity with poor self-rated health among Chinese older adults

 

Model 1a

Model 2b

Model 3c

Model 4d

Model 5e

Vigorous level of physical activity

 No

1 [Reference]

    

 Yes

0.79**(0.65–0.97)

    

Moderate level of physical activity

 No

 

1 [Reference]

   

 Yes

 

1.04(0.92–1.18)

   

Walk/bike activity

 No

  

1 [Reference]

  

 Yes

  

0.53***(0.46–0.60)

  

Vigorous fitness/leisure

 No

   

1 [Reference]

 

 Yes

   

0.57***(0.39–0.84)

 

Moderate fitness/leisure

 No

    

1 [Reference]

 Yes

    

0.31***(0.26–0.38)

Marital status

 Never married

1 [Reference]

1 [Reference]

1 [Reference]

1 [Reference]

 

 Currently married

0.31***(0.29–0.34)

0.31***(0.28–0.35)

0.84**(0.72–0.98)

0.31***(0.29–0.33)

 

 Cohabiting

0.40(0.10–1.67)

0.41(0.10–1.78)

1.16(0.25–5.30)

0.38(0.09–1.62)

 

 Separated/divorced

0.29***(0.18–0.48)

0.30***(0.18–0.49)

0.74(0.43–1.25)

0.30***(0.18–0.50)

 

 Widowed

0.46***(0.40–0.52)

0.47***(0.40–0.55)

1.08(0.90–1.29)

0.46***(0.40–0.52)

 

Ethnicity

 Han majority

1 [Reference]

1 [Reference]

1 [Reference]

1 [Reference]

1 [Reference]

 Ethnic minority

0.95(0.59–1.53)

1.03(0.64–1.66)

0.69(0.40–1.19)

0.95(0.59–1.54)

0.69(0.42–1.15)

Always lived in this village/town/city

 No

 

1 [Reference]

  

1 [Reference]

 Yes

 

0.87** (0.76–0.98)

  

0.37***(0.34–0.41)

Fruit intake

 0

  

1 [Reference]

  

 1

  

0.71***(0.57–0.88)

  

 2

  

0.50***(0.42–0.60)

  

 3

  

0.35***(0.27–0.44)

  

  ≥ 4

  

0.33***(0.27–0.40)

  
  1. Note: *** and ** indicates 1 and 5% significance level, respectively
  2. AOR adjusted odds ratio
  3. aFruit intake, Age group, gender, ever schooled, always lived in this village/town/city, and vegetable intake were screened out as the confounding variables
  4. bFruit intake, Age group, gender, ever schooled, and vegetable intake were screened out as the confounding variables
  5. cAge group, gender, ever schooled, always lived in this village/town/city, and vegetable intake were screened out as the confounding variables
  6. dFruit intake, Age group, gender, ever schooled, always lived in this village/town/city, and vegetable intake were screened out as the confounding variables
  7. eFruit intake, Age group, gender, marital status, ever schooled, and vegetable intake were screened out as the confounding variables