Skip to main content

Table 2 Adjusted odds ratios (and 95% confidence intervals) of fruit intake (servings) and physical activities, AOR(95%CI)

From: Associations of fruit & vegetable intake and physical activity with poor self-rated health among Chinese older adults

  Vigorous level of physical activitya Moderate level of physical activityb Walk/bike activityc Vigorous fitness/leisured Moderate fitness/leisuree
Fruit intake
 0 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
 1 0.40***(0.29–0.55) 0.81**(0.68–0.96) 1.24**(1.01–1.52) 0.05***(0.04–0.08) 0.25***(0.20–0.30)
 2 0.52***(0.42–0.65) 1.08(0.95–1.22) 1.38***(1.17–1.63) 0.05***(0.04–0.06) 0.29***(0.26–0.34)
 3 0.41***(0.31–0.56) 1.10(0.93–1.30) 1.31**(1.07–1.60) 0.04***(0.03–0.06) 0.36***(0.31–0.42)
  ≥ 4 0.39***(0.31–0.50) 0.83***(0.73–0.95) 1.32***(1.12–1.57) 0.06***(0.04–0.07) 0.39***(0.34–0.44)
Age group (years)
 60–69      1 [Reference]
  ≥ 70      0.42***(0.38–0.47)
Marital status
 Never married 1 [Reference]   1 [Reference]   
 Currently married 0.32***(0.28–0.38)   1.78***(1.57–2.01)   
 Cohabiting 0.44(0.09–2.10)   1.56(0.40–6.09)   
 Separated/divorced 0.19***(0.09–0.38)   2.44***(1.48–4.04)   
 Widowed 0.18***(0.14–0.22)   1.38***(1.18–1.61)   
Ethnicity
 Han majority 1 [Reference]   1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
 Ethnic minority 0.47*(0.22–1.01)   0.72(0.43–1.21) 0.10***(0.03–0.35) 0.47**(0.25–0.90)
Always lived in this village/town/city
 Yes   1 [Reference]    
 No   0.96(0.86–1.07)    
  1. Note: ***, ** and * indicates 1, 5 and 10% significance level, respectively
  2. AOR adjusted odds ratio
  3. aAge group, gender, ever schooled, always lived in this village/town/city, vegetable intake, and poor SRH were screened out as the confounding variables
  4. bAge group, gender, marital status, ever schooled, ethnicity, vegetable intake, and poor SRH were screened out as the confounding variables
  5. cAge group, gender, ever schooled, always lived in this village/town/city, vegetable intake, and poor SRH were screened out as the confounding variables
  6. dAge group, gender, marital status, ever schooled, always lived in this village/town/city, vegetable intake, and poor SRH were screened out as the confounding variables
  7. eGender, marital status, ever schooled, always lived in this village/town/city, vegetable intake, and poor SRH were screened out as the confounding variables