Skip to main content

Table 6 The GRADE assessment for the overall certainty of evidence across studies

From: Effects of different exercise training modes on muscle strength and physical performance in older people with sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Quality assessment

Number of patients

Effect

Quality

Importance

Number of studies

Design

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Other considerations

Muscle strength

Control

Relative (95% CI)

Absolute

  

KES subgroup (follow-up 0–24 weeks; Better indicated by lower values)

 17

randomised trials

seriousa

serious

(I2 = 75)

no serious indirectness

no serious imprecision

none

415

394

–

SMD 0.86 higher (0.55 to 1.16 higher)

⊕ ⊕ OO

LOW

CRITICAL

TUG subgroup (follow-up 0–24 weeks; Better indicated by lower values)

 9

randomised trials

seriousb

serious

(I2 = 60)

no serious indirectness

no serious imprecision

none

279

264

–

SMD 0.66 lower (0.94 to 0.38 lower)

⊕ ⊕ OO

LOW

CRITICAL

GS subgroup (follow-up 0–24 weeks; Better indicated by lower values)

 17

randomised trials

seriousc

serious

(I2 = 87)

no serious indirectness

no serious imprecision

none

500

465

–

SMD 0.82 higher (0.43 to 1.21 higher)

⊕ ⊕ OO

LOW

CRITICAL

CS subgroup (follow-up 0–24 weeks; Better indicated by lower values)

 10

randomised trials

seriousd

serious

(I2 = 87)

no serious indirectness

no serious imprecision

none

313

298

–

SMD 0.11 higher (0.36 lower to 0.57 higher)

⊕ ⊕ OO

LOW

–

  1. KES knee extension strength, TUG timed up and go, GS gait speed, CS chair stand
  2. a Of the 17 studies, 6 not performed concealed allocation and 9 were not blinded for assessors
  3. b Of the 9 studies, 6 were not blinded for assessors. c Of the 17 studies, 10 were not blinded for assessors. d Of the 10 studies, 6 were not blinded for assessors