Table 4 Associate between FRS at baseline (wave 1) and combined mortality and incident frailty during the follow-up (wave2-wave3)
From: The Framingham risk score is associated with incident frailty, or is it?
| Model 1 a | Model 2 b | Model 3 c | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | p Value | HR (95% CI) | p Value | HR (95% CI) | p Value | |
| Generalized FRS [2008] (n=3,033) | 1.06 (1.04 to 1.09) | <0.001 | 1.05 (1.02 to 1.08) | <0.001 | 1.02 (0.99 to 1.05) | 0.327 |
| Generalized FRS [2008] after excluding incident CVD (n=2,794) | 1.06 (1.03 to 1.09) | <0.001 | 1.05 (1.02 to 1.09) | <0.001 | 1.01 (0.98 to 1.05) | 0.381 |
| Generalized FRS [2008] after excluding baseline depression (n=2,407) | 1.08 (1.04 to 1.11) | <0.001 | 1.07 (1.03 to 1.11) | <0.001 | 1.03 (1.00 to 1.07) | 0.078 |
| Updated FRS [2015]d (n=3,033) | 1.16 (1.11 to 1.21) | <0.001 | 1.13 (1.08 to 1.19) | <0.001 | 1.04 (0.98 to 1.10) | 0.198 |