Table 3 Associate between the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) at baseline (wave 1) and incident frailty during the follow-up (wave2-wave3)
From: The Framingham risk score is associated with incident frailty, or is it?
| Model 1 a | Model 2 b | Model 3 c | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | P Value | HR (95% CI) | P Value | HR (95% CI) | P Value | |
| Generalized FRS [2008](n=2,901) | 1.03 (1.01 to 1.06) | 0.013 | 1.03 (1.00 to 1.06) | 0.030 | 1.00 (0.97 to 1.03) | 0.773 |
| Generalized FRS [2008] after excluding incident CVD (n=2,669) | 1.03 (1.01 to 1.06) | 0.017 | 1.03 (1.00 to 1.06) | 0.049 | 0.99 (0.96 to 1.03) | 0.651 |
| Generalized FRS [2008] after excluding baseline depression (n=2,311) | 1.05 (1.01 to 1.08) | 0.005 | 1.05 (1.01 to 1.08) | 0.010 | 1.01 (0.97 to 1.05) | 0.668 |
| Updated FRS [2015]d (n=2,901) | 1.10 (1.05 to 1.16) | <0.001 | 1.08 (1.02 to 1.14) | 0.009 | 0.99 (0.93 to 1.07) | 0.865 |