Skip to main content

Table 2 RE-AIM Criteria Included in Each Study

From: Applying the RE-AIM implementation framework to evaluate fall prevention interventions in community dwelling adults with cognitive impairment: a review and secondary analysis

 

Study

(reference)

 

RE-AIM Element

Criteria

Varriano, 2020 (32)

Goldberg, 2019

(33)

Padala, 2017 (34)

Zieschang, 2017

(35)

Sungkarat, 2017

(36)

Schwenk, 2016 (37)

Montero-Odasso, 2019 (42)

Chen, 2018 (40)

Kim, 2017 (41)

Wesson, 2013

(1)

Suttanon, 2013

(38)

Hernandez, 2010

(39)

Total

Reach

Described target population

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

12

Demographic, behavioral information about target population

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

12

Method to identify the target population

x

x

x

x

x

x

 

x

 

x

x

x

10

Recruitment strategies

x

x

     

x

 

x

x

x

6

Inclusion/exclusion criteria for individuals

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

 

11

Eligible, invited (exposed to recruitment) potential participants

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

 

x

x

 

10

Sample size

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

12

Individual participation rate (sample size/eligible invited potential participants)

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

 

x

x

 

10

Comparisons between the target population and the study sample

   

x

        

1

Statistical comparisons between the target population and the study sample

   

x

        

1

Cost of recruitment

            

0

Qualitative methods to measure reach

            

0

Effectiveness

Report of mediators

   

x

        

1

Report of moderators

  

x

x

x

x

x

x

  

x

 

7

Intent-to-treat

  

x

x

x

 

x

x

 

x

x

 

7

Imputation procedures

  

x

 

x

  

x

 

x

x

 

5

Quality-of-life measures

x

x

x

     

x

 

x

 

5

Unintended consequences measures/results

x

x

x

 

x

x

x

x

 

x

x

 

9

Percent attrition (at program completion)

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

 

x

x

x

11

Cost-effectiveness

            

0

Qualitative methods to measure efficacy/effectiveness

     

x

      

1

Adoption, setting

Eligible, invited potential settings

            

0

Number of participating settings

 

x

  

x

x

  

x

   

4

Setting participation rate

            

0

Description of the targeted location

            

0

Inclusion/exclusion criteria of the setting

            

0

Description of intervention location

 

x

x

 

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

 

9

Method to identify the setting

            

0

Comparisons between the targeted and participating settings

            

0

Statistical comparisons between the targeted and participating settings

            

0

Average number of persons served per setting

            

0

Adoption, provider/staff

Eligible, invited potential providers (staff)

            

0

Number of participating providers (staff)

            

0

Provider (staff) participation rate

            

0

Method to identify target providers

            

0

Level of expertise of providers

 

x

 

x

x

  

x

 

x

x

 

6

Inclusion/exclusion criteria for providers

            

0

Comparisons between targeted and participating providers (staff)

            

0

Statistical comparisons between targeted and participating providers (staff)

            

0

Measures of cost adoption

            

0

Dissemination beyond originally planned

            

0

Qualitative methods to measure adoption

            

0

Implementation

Theory-based

       

x

x

x

x

 

4

Engagement to inform intervention

 

x

x

      

x

x

 

4

Number of intervention contacts

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

12

Timing of intervention contacts

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

 

x

11

Duration of intervention contacts

 

x

 

x

x

x

 

x

x

x

 

x

8

Extent protocol delivered as intended (fidelity)

 

x

       

x

  

2

Consistency of implementation across settings or providers

       

x

 

x

  

2

Tailoring of intervention

 

x

 

x

     

x

x

 

4

Participant attendance/completion rates

 

x

x

 

x

x

   

x

x

 

6

Measure of intervention cost

            

0

Qualitative methods to measure implementation

x

    

x

   

x

x

 

4

Maintenance

Follow-up outcome measures at some duration after intervention termination

x

 

x

x

        

3

Attrition/loss to follow-up of individuals

  

x

         

1

Qualitative methods to measure individual maintenance of the intervention

            

0

Intervention alignment with the organization’s mission

            

0

Maintenance of the program after completion of the study

            

0

Modifications made to the original program

            

0

Institutionalization of the program in the setting or system

            

0

Attrition/loss to follow-up of settings

            

0

Qualitative methods to measure organizational maintenance/ sustainability

            

0

TOTAL FOR STUDY

 

15

21

20

18

19

19

13

20

11

23

22

10

 
  1. Note: x indicates RE-AIM item reported for completeness