Table 2 RE-AIM Criteria Included in Each Study
|
Study (reference) | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RE-AIM Element | Criteria | Varriano, 2020 (32) |
Goldberg, 2019 (33) | Padala, 2017 (34) |
Zieschang, 2017 (35) |
Sungkarat, 2017 (36) | Schwenk, 2016 (37) | Montero-Odasso, 2019 (42) | Chen, 2018 (40) | Kim, 2017 (41) |
Wesson, 2013 (1) |
Suttanon, 2013 (38) |
Hernandez, 2010 (39) | Total |
| Reach | Described target population | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 12 |
| Demographic, behavioral information about target population | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 12 | |
| Method to identify the target population | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 10 | |||
| Recruitment strategies | x | x | x | x | x | x | 6 | |||||||
| Inclusion/exclusion criteria for individuals | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 11 | ||
| Eligible, invited (exposed to recruitment) potential participants | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 10 | |||
| Sample size | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 12 | |
| Individual participation rate (sample size/eligible invited potential participants) | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 10 | |||
| Comparisons between the target population and the study sample | x | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Statistical comparisons between the target population and the study sample | x | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Cost of recruitment | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Qualitative methods to measure reach | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Effectiveness | Report of mediators | x | 1 | |||||||||||
| Report of moderators | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 7 | ||||||
| Intent-to-treat | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 7 | ||||||
| Imputation procedures | x | x | x | x | x | 5 | ||||||||
| Quality-of-life measures | x | x | x | x | x | 5 | ||||||||
| Unintended consequences measures/results | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 9 | ||||
| Percent attrition (at program completion) | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 11 | ||
| Cost-effectiveness | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Qualitative methods to measure efficacy/effectiveness | x | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Adoption, setting | Eligible, invited potential settings | 0 | ||||||||||||
| Number of participating settings | x | x | x | x | 4 | |||||||||
| Setting participation rate | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Description of the targeted location | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Inclusion/exclusion criteria of the setting | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Description of intervention location | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 9 | ||||
| Method to identify the setting | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Comparisons between the targeted and participating settings | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Statistical comparisons between the targeted and participating settings | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Average number of persons served per setting | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Adoption, provider/staff | Eligible, invited potential providers (staff) | 0 | ||||||||||||
| Number of participating providers (staff) | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Provider (staff) participation rate | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Method to identify target providers | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Level of expertise of providers | x | x | x | x | x | x | 6 | |||||||
| Inclusion/exclusion criteria for providers | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Comparisons between targeted and participating providers (staff) | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Statistical comparisons between targeted and participating providers (staff) | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Measures of cost adoption | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Dissemination beyond originally planned | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Qualitative methods to measure adoption | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Implementation | Theory-based | x | x | x | x | 4 | ||||||||
| Engagement to inform intervention | x | x | x | x | 4 | |||||||||
| Number of intervention contacts | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 12 | |
| Timing of intervention contacts | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 11 | ||
| Duration of intervention contacts | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 8 | |||||
| Extent protocol delivered as intended (fidelity) | x | x | 2 | |||||||||||
| Consistency of implementation across settings or providers | x | x | 2 | |||||||||||
| Tailoring of intervention | x | x | x | x | 4 | |||||||||
| Participant attendance/completion rates | x | x | x | x | x | x | 6 | |||||||
| Measure of intervention cost | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Qualitative methods to measure implementation | x | x | x | x | 4 | |||||||||
| Maintenance | Follow-up outcome measures at some duration after intervention termination | x | x | x | 3 | |||||||||
| Attrition/loss to follow-up of individuals | x | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Qualitative methods to measure individual maintenance of the intervention | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Intervention alignment with the organization’s mission | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Maintenance of the program after completion of the study | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Modifications made to the original program | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Institutionalization of the program in the setting or system | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Attrition/loss to follow-up of settings | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Qualitative methods to measure organizational maintenance/ sustainability | 0 | |||||||||||||
| TOTAL FOR STUDY | 15 | 21 | 20 | 18 | 19 | 19 | 13 | 20 | 11 | 23 | 22 | 10 | ||