Skip to main content

Table 2 RE-AIM Criteria Included in Each Study

From: Applying the RE-AIM implementation framework to evaluate fall prevention interventions in community dwelling adults with cognitive impairment: a review and secondary analysis

  Study
(reference)
 
RE-AIM Element Criteria Varriano, 2020 (32) Goldberg, 2019
(33)
Padala, 2017 (34) Zieschang, 2017
(35)
Sungkarat, 2017
(36)
Schwenk, 2016 (37) Montero-Odasso, 2019 (42) Chen, 2018 (40) Kim, 2017 (41) Wesson, 2013
(1)
Suttanon, 2013
(38)
Hernandez, 2010
(39)
Total
Reach Described target population x x x x x x x x x x x x 12
Demographic, behavioral information about target population x x x x x x x x x x x x 12
Method to identify the target population x x x x x x   x   x x x 10
Recruitment strategies x x       x   x x x 6
Inclusion/exclusion criteria for individuals x x x x x x x x x x x   11
Eligible, invited (exposed to recruitment) potential participants x x x x x x x x   x x   10
Sample size x x x x x x x x x x x x 12
Individual participation rate (sample size/eligible invited potential participants) x x x x x x x x   x x   10
Comparisons between the target population and the study sample     x          1
Statistical comparisons between the target population and the study sample     x          1
Cost of recruitment              0
Qualitative methods to measure reach              0
Effectiveness Report of mediators     x          1
Report of moderators    x x x x x x    x   7
Intent-to-treat    x x x   x x   x x   7
Imputation procedures    x   x    x   x x   5
Quality-of-life measures x x x       x   x   5
Unintended consequences measures/results x x x   x x x x   x x   9
Percent attrition (at program completion) x x x x x x x x   x x x 11
Cost-effectiveness              0
Qualitative methods to measure efficacy/effectiveness       x        1
Adoption, setting Eligible, invited potential settings              0
Number of participating settings   x    x x    x     4
Setting participation rate              0
Description of the targeted location              0
Inclusion/exclusion criteria of the setting              0
Description of intervention location   x x   x x x x x x x   9
Method to identify the setting              0
Comparisons between the targeted and participating settings              0
Statistical comparisons between the targeted and participating settings              0
Average number of persons served per setting              0
Adoption, provider/staff Eligible, invited potential providers (staff)              0
Number of participating providers (staff)              0
Provider (staff) participation rate              0
Method to identify target providers              0
Level of expertise of providers   x   x x    x   x x   6
Inclusion/exclusion criteria for providers              0
Comparisons between targeted and participating providers (staff)              0
Statistical comparisons between targeted and participating providers (staff)              0
Measures of cost adoption              0
Dissemination beyond originally planned              0
Qualitative methods to measure adoption              0
Implementation Theory-based         x x x x   4
Engagement to inform intervention   x x        x x   4
Number of intervention contacts x x x x x x x x x x x x 12
Timing of intervention contacts x x x x x x x x x x   x 11
Duration of intervention contacts   x   x x x   x x x   x 8
Extent protocol delivered as intended (fidelity)   x         x    2
Consistency of implementation across settings or providers         x   x    2
Tailoring of intervention   x   x       x x   4
Participant attendance/completion rates   x x   x x     x x   6
Measure of intervention cost              0
Qualitative methods to measure implementation x      x     x x   4
Maintenance Follow-up outcome measures at some duration after intervention termination x   x x          3
Attrition/loss to follow-up of individuals    x           1
Qualitative methods to measure individual maintenance of the intervention              0
Intervention alignment with the organization’s mission              0
Maintenance of the program after completion of the study              0
Modifications made to the original program              0
Institutionalization of the program in the setting or system              0
Attrition/loss to follow-up of settings              0
Qualitative methods to measure organizational maintenance/ sustainability              0
TOTAL FOR STUDY   15 21 20 18 19 19 13 20 11 23 22 10  
  1. Note: x indicates RE-AIM item reported for completeness