Skip to main content

Table 4 Extent of Performance of the RID intervention

From: Process evaluation of a tailored intervention to Reduce Inappropriate psychotropic Drug use in nursing home residents with dementia

NH 1a) Atten-dance MPT 1b) Meetings coach + MPT 1c) (Phone)-meetings coach + PL 3a) AIP * created 3b) Contribution coach, PL, MPT in designing AIP 3c) Adjustments AIP based on feedback 4a) Start with implementation in weeks 4b) Execution A actions of AIP as intended 7) Adjustments AIP based on interim results
1 76–100% 9 0 Yes (Very) large Yes Within 8 8.4 Not necessary
2 0–25% 7 5 Yes (Very) large Yes Within 8–16 8.5 Yes
3 26–50% 13 12 Yes (Very) large Yes >  16 5.4 No
4 76–100% 7 3 Yes (Very) large Yes Within 8 7.0 Yes
5 26–50% 9 7 Yes (Very) large Yes Within 8–16 6.4 Yes
6 26–50% 5 4 Yes (Very) large Yes Within 8–16 7.9 Not necessary
7 51–75% 8 3 Yes (Very) large Yes Within 8–16 7.9 Yes
8 26–50% 11 12 Yes (Very) large Yes Within 8–16 6.3 Yes
9 76–100% 9 8 Yes (Very) large Yes Within 8–16 7.0 N.A. B
10 51–75% 6 2 Yes (Very) large Yes Within 8–16 3.4 N.A.
11 76–100% 5 3 No. N.A. N.A. >  16 5.0 N.A.
12 26–50% 7 2 Yes (Very) large Yes Within 8–16 6.8 N.A.
13 76–100% 8 4 Yes (Very) large Yes Within 8 7.3 N.A.
14 76–100% 5 7 Yes (Very) large Yes Within 8–16 7.8 N.A.
15 76–100% 5 1 Yes Reasonable No Within 8–16 5.3 N.A.
16 76–100% 7 10 Yes (Very) large Yes Within 8–16 6.3 N.A.
  1. Abbreviations: AIP (tailored) Action and Implementation Plan, MPT Multidisciplinary Project Team, NH Nursing Home, PL (internal) Project Leader
  2. A Mean of implementation scores of each action from AIP: 10-point scale (0 not at all implemented as intended – 10 totally implemented as intended) per action
  3. B Not Applicable: nursing homes 9–16 were in the deferred control group (start with the intervention in the second 8-month period and had therefore no interim results)