Skip to main content

Table 2 Multivariable logistic regression analysis for the association between nutritional status and BADL limitation a, b

From: The association between nutritional status and functional limitations among centenarians: a cross-sectional study

 

Nutritional status

p for trend

Normal

At risk

Malnutrition

Total population

   

Crude model

1

2.952(1.506–5.787)

22.277(10.978–45.208)

Ë‚0.001

Model 1

1

2.864(1.448–5.664)

20.955(10.169–43.179)

Ë‚0.001

Model 2

1

2.388(1.190–4.792)

16.770(7.972–35.280)

Ë‚0.001

Model 3

1

2.390(1.189–4.804)

17.060(8.093–35.964)

Ë‚0.001

Man

    

Crude model

1

2.340(0.658–8.319)

12.600(2.977–53.323)

Ë‚0.001

Model 1

1

2.457(0.652–9.260)

12.438(2.702–57.259)

Ë‚0.001

Model 2

1

2.201(0.538–9.004)

19.033(3.454-104.881)

Ë‚0.001

Model 3

1

2.262(0.548–9.334)

19.658(3.497–110.510)

Ë‚0.001

Woman

    

Crude model

1

3.214(1.447–7.136)

25.390(11.074–58.213)

Ë‚0.001

Model 1

1

3.176(1.421–7.102)

25.071(10.790-58.253)

Ë‚0.001

Model 2

1

2.731(1.196–6.240)

19.913(8.340-47.548)

Ë‚0.001

Model 3

1

2.765(1.207–6.336)

20.824(8.680–49.960)

Ë‚0.001

  1. a Crude model: None adjusted; Model 1: Adjusted for age, sex, educational level, residence types, physical activity; Model 2: Model 1 plus hemoglobin, serum albumin, total cholesterol; Model 3: Model 2 plus diabetes, hypertension, heart disease
  2. b Described as OR (95 %CI)