Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of QoL instruments

From: Instruments used to assess quality of life of older adults in African countries: a scoping review

QOL instrument

No. of studies

No. items

Domains

Reliability

Validity

Languages

Mode of

administration

Answer categories

EUROHIS-QOL-8 [14,15,16,17,18,19,20]

7

8

• physical;

• psychological;

• social;

• environmental

ND for study cohorts under consideration

ND for study cohorts under consideration

• Shangaan [14, 17]

• Xitsonga [18]

• Local language Nairobi (Kenya) [15, 16]

• Local language in Agincourt (South-Africa) [20]

• Kiswahili [19]

• IA [14,15,16,17,18,19,20]

5- point Likert scale

SLWS [21,22,23]

3

5

Satisfaction with life as a whole

Internal reliability:

• α = 0.82 [21]

• α = 0.81 [22]

• α = 0.92 [23]

• Good content validity based on expert meeting [21]

• ND [22, 23]

• Wolof [21]

• Yoruba [22]

• Portugese [23]

• IA [21]

• ND [22]

• IA/SA [23]

7-point Likert scale

WHOQOL-OLD [24, 25]

2

24

• sensory abilities

• autonomy

• past, present, and future activities

• social participation

• death and dying

• intimacy

• Per domain α ranging from 0.72 to 0.84 [24]

• ND for this study cohort [25]

• Good factor structure [24]

• ND for this study cohort [25]

• Afrikaans [24]

• Unknown [25]

• SA/IA [24]

• IA [25]

5-point Likert scale

WHOQOL-BREF [26, 27]

2

26

• physical;

• psychological;

• social;

• environmental

• Internal consistency each domain α > 0.67 [26]

• Cronbach α > 0.86 [27]

ND for this study cohort [26, 27]

• Sesotho [26]

• Yoruba [27]

• IA [26]

• SA/IA [27]

5- point Likert scale

SF-36 [28, 29]

2

36

• physical health

o physical functioning

o physical role limitation

o bodily pain

o general health

• mental health:

o vitality

o social functioning,

o role limitation due to emotional problems

o mental health

ND for this cohort [28, 29]

ND for this cohort [28, 29]

• Unknown [28]

• IA [28]

Mix of 5 / 3 – point Likert scale and yes/no answers

SF-12 [30]

1

12

• physical health

o physical functioning

o physical role limitation

o bodily pain

o general health

• mental health:

o vitality

o social functioning,

o role limitation due to emotional problems

Internal reliability:

• Physical health α = 0.76

• mental health α = 0.74 [30]

• Construct validity good (differences between subgroups)

• convergent validity good: (r > 0.40) [30]

Tunisian [30]

IA [30]

Mix of 5 / 3 – point Likert scale and yes/no answers

RAND-36 [12]

1

36

• physical functioning

• bodily pain

• limitation because of physical health problems

• role limitation because of personal or emotional problems

• emotional well-being

• social functioning,

• energy or fatigue

• general health perception.

Not assessed (only refer to reliability of SF-36 tested in Ghanese setting where α = 0.82) [12]

Description of adequate face and content validity [12]

Setswana and isiZulu [12]

IA [12]

Mix of 5 / 3 – point Likert scale and yes/no answers

  1. ND Not Described; IA Interviewer Administered; SA Self-Administered; EUROHIS-QOL-8 WHOQOL World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale; SWLS Satisfaction with Life Scale; WHOQOL-OLD World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale- OLD version; WHOQOL-BREF World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale- brief version; SF-36 Short-Form Health Survey-36 item; SF-12 Short-Form Health Survey 12-item