Feasibility of a multicomponent cognitive behavioral intervention for fear of falling after hip fracture: process evaluation of the FIT-HIP intervention

Table 3 Performance according to protocol

	Patients from all units (n = 36)^a
	n	%	Min-max
FIT-HIP intake
Number of patients who received the FIT-HIP intake	36	100	^b
Guided exposure
Number of patients with ≥1 session(s) of guided exposure	35	97.2	^b
Mean number of sessions with guided exposure per patient^c; mean (SD)	18.9 (18.3)	^b	1–95
Percentage of therapy sessions with guided exposure^c; mean (SD)	^b	56.6 (28.3)	5–100
Psychoeducation
Number of patients with ≥1 session(s) of psychoeducation within the first 3 weeks of study participation	34	94.4	^b
Mean number of sessions with psychoeducation within the first 3 weeks of study participation per patient^c; mean (SD)	1.9 (1.3)	^b	1–7
Cognitive restructuring (homework)
Number of patients with ≥1 session(s) with cognitive restructuring	26	72.2	^b
Mean number of sessions with cognitive restructuring per patient^c; mean (SD)	3.5 (1.9)	^b	1–8
Number of patients who received ≥1 homework assignment for cognitive restructuring	18	50.0	^b
Mean number of sessions registered for cognitive restructuring homework per patient^c; mean (SD)	1.8 (1.2)	^b	1–6
Staying Active Plan
Number of patients who received a Staying Active Plan	34	94.4	^b
Mean number of sessions registered for the Staying Active Plan per patient ^c; mean (SD)	2.0 (1.0)	^b	1–4
Telephonic booster
Number of patients who received the telephonic booster after discharge	14	38.9	^b

Notes: ^aAll patients who (in part) received the FIT-HIP intervention (n = 37); data missing from n = 1 patient. ^bNot applicable. ^cBased on patients who have received that element of the FIT-HIP intervention

ISSN: 1471-2318