Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of the characteristics of the intervention and control groups

From: Efficacy of the self-mutual-group model targeting quality of life improvement among empty-nest older adults in Taiyuan, China: an intervention study

Characteristic

Total

N(%)

Intervention

Control

χ2

P

n (%)

n (%)

Sex

 Male

190 (54.3)

96 (57.5)

94 (51.4)

1.317

0.251

 Female

160 (45.7)

71 (42.5)

89 (48.6)

Age

 60–69 years

175 (50.0)

86 (51.5)

89 (48.6)

1.865

0.394

 70–79 years

135 (38.6)

59 (35.3)

76 (41.5)

 80 years or above

40 (11.4)

22 (13.2)

18 (9.9)

Education

 No education

79 (22.6)

36 (21.6)

43 (23.5)

0.986

0.964

 Primary school

95 (27.1)

47 (28.1)

48 (26.2)

 Secondary school

97 (27.7)

48 (28.7)

49 (26.8)

 High school

54 (15.4)

26 (15.6)

28 (15.3)

 Junior college

10 (2.9)

4 (2.4)

6 (3.3)

 University or above

15 (4.3)

6 (3.6)

9 (4.9)

Marital Status

 Married

244 (69.7)

113 (67.7)

131 (71.6)

0.948

0.814

 Never married

16 (4.6)

9 (5.4)

7 (3.8)

 Divorced

10 (2.9)

5 (3.0)

5 (2.7)

 Widowed

80 (22.8)

40 (23.9)

40 (21.9)

Living form

 Living with spouse

213 (60.8)

101 (60.5)

112 (61.2)

0.919

0.821

 Living alone

78 (22.3)

39 (23.3)

39 (21.3)

 Living with parents

50 (14.3)

24 (14.4)

26 (14.2)

 Living in a nursing home

9 (2.6)

3 (1.8)

6 (3.3)

Children visit frequency

 Never visit

4 (1.1)

2 (1.2)

2 (1.1)

45.732

< 0.001

 Irregularly

3 (0.9)

1 (0.6)

2 (1.1)

 Once more than half a year

7 (2.0)

4 (2.4)

3 (1.6)

 Once every six months

108 (30.9)

51 (30.5)

57 (31.2)

 1–2 times a month

113 (32.3)

52 (31.1)

61 (33.3)

 Once a week

52 (14.8)

29 (17.4)

23 (12.6)

 More than once a week

63 (18.0)

28 (16.8)

35 (19.1)

Employment status

 Working

35 (10.0)

18 (10.8)

17 (9.3)

0.215

0.643

 Not working

315 (90.0)

149 (89.2)

166 (90.7)

Income Source

 Retirement pensions

127 (36.3)

64 (38.3)

63 (34.4)

2.665

0.751

 Personal labor income

58 (16.6)

23 (13.8)

35 (19.1)

 Child supply

108 (30.9)

54 (32.3)

54 (29.5)

 Spouse supply

20 (5.7)

9 (5.4)

11 (6.0)

 Social relief

32 (9.1)

14 (8.4)

18 (9.9)

 Other

5 (1.4)

3 (1.8)

2 (1.1)

Monthly income

 No income

112 (32.0)

51 (30.5)

61 (33.3)

1.922

0.589

  < 1000 RMB

88 (25.1)

43 (25.8)

45 (24.6)

 1000–3000 RMB

90 (25.7)

40 (23.9)

50 (27.3)

  > 3000 RMB

60 (17.2)

33 (19.8)

27 (14.8)

Spousal relationship

 Perfect

125 (38.6)

62 (40.5)

63 (36.8)

2.824

0.419

 Good

170 (52.5)

79 (51.6)

91 (53.2)

 Bad

25 (7.7)

9 (5.9)

16 (9.4)

 Worst

4 (1.2)

3 (2.0)

1 (0.6)

Relationship with their children

 Perfect

119 (35.6)

58 (36.7)

61 (34.7)

0.787

0.853

 Good

188 (56.3)

86 (54.4)

102 (57.9)

 Bad

22 (6.6)

12 (7.6)

10 (5.7)

 Worst

5 (1.5)

2 (1.3)

3 (1.7)

Social activity participation

 Most

37 (10.6)

19 (11.4)

18 (9.8)

1.419

0.701

 More

117 (33.4)

60 (35.9)

57 (31.2)

 Less

154 (44.0)

69 (41.3)

85 (46.4)

 No

42 (12.0)

19 (11.4)

23 (12.6)

Self-care ability

 Completely self-care

282 (80.6)

136 (81.4)

146 (79.8)

0.153

0.696

 Partly self-care

68 (19.4)

31 (18.6)

37 (20.2)

Chronic disease

 Yes

109 (31.1)

44 (26.4)

65 (35.5)

3.425

0.064

 No

241 (68.9)

123 (73.6)

118 (64.5)

  1. Note: The survey of the spousal relationship did not include the participants who had never married or were divorced, and the survey of their relationships with their children did not include participants without children