Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of Included Studies - Patient, Staff and Setting Characteristics

From: Understanding transitional care programs for older adults who experience delayed discharge: a scoping review

First Author, Publication Year

Region

Design

Sample Size

Setting

Staff Mix

Sample Characteristics

(At the time of admission to TCP)

Age [Mean

(Range or SD)]

Female (%)

Multimorbidity

[%, Mean

(Range or SD)]

Cognitive Status

[Mean

(Range or SD)]

Function

[Mean

(Range or SD)]

Living Arrangement

Abrahamsen, 2014 [18]

Europe

Prospective cohort study

557

LTCH/NH

Geriatrician, physician, nurses,

PT & OT

Median: 86

70

61%

MMSE: mean: 26 (8–30)

BI: 15 (4–20)

74% alone

Abrahamsen, 2016 [19]

Europe

Prospective, cohort study

961

LTCH/NH

Nursing, OT, PT, SW & dietitian

85

68.4

59%

MMSE: 26 (8–30)

BI: 75 (10–100)

67% alone

Anderson, 2005 [20]

US

Retrospective, medical record audit

68

Community hospital

Nursing, PT, OT, SLP, dietitian.

If needed, respiratory therapy

79.7

64.7

Majority had 8 conditions

Most patients oriented to the environment; 50% had intact STM

NR

26% alone

57.3% with someone

7.4% seniors housing

Bergman-Evans, 2010 [21]

US

Retrospective cohort study

1430

SNF

NPs, physicians, SW,

78

64

Average # of medications: 10.1

NR

NR

NR

Blewett, 2010 [22]

US

Multi-method non-randomized experimental study

339

SNF

Geriatrician, geriatric NP, geriatric pharmacist, nursing, dietitian, SW, therapeutic recreation & spiritual care

76.8

66

NR

NR

NR

NR

Bowcutt, 2000 [23]

US

Randomized controlled trial

191

Subacute unit inside University hospital

Geriatric CNS, nurses, dietitian, PT, OT, SLP, hearing therapist, SW, activity specialist, chaplain, physicians.

72.9

61.8

NR

Had to be mentally alert

NR

NR

Brusco, 2012 [24]

Australia

Prospective cohort study

696

Hospital ward, residential care facility,

Community i.e., patients’ homes

PT, physicians, nursing & other allied health and support services staff

81.9 (8.7)

59.5

CCI: 1.7 (1.8)

NR

BI: 60.4 (28.9)

NR

Burke, 2015 [25]

US

Retrospective survey analysis

2.99 million

SNF

NA

76.7

63

NR

NR

NR

NR

Buurman, 2016 [26]

US

Prospective cohort study

394

SNF

Rehabilitation staff-not clearly reported

84.9

67.8

Had 2 or more medical conditions.

MMSE < 24: 25.6%

No. of disabilities: 6 (2–9)

48.2% alone

Chan, 2019 [27]

Australia

Retrospective cohort study

369

LTCH/NH

Geriatrician, RN, PT, OT & SW

82.9 (SD 7.84)

64.80

CCI: 2.5 (2.1)

23.6% had Cognitive impairment; 10% had dementia diagnosis

Baseline BI Mean (SD):

64.0 (58.7)

58.3% alone

Crotty, 2005 [28]

Australia

Randomized controlled trial

317

Transitional care facility

Pharmacist, geriatrician, rehabilitation medicine physician, PT, SW, GP, nursing, other allied health staff & a transitional care nurse coordinator

83.0 (7.2)

49

NR

NR

BI: CG - 50.5 (29.7); IG - 45.8 (30.7)

NR

Dahl, 2015 [29]

Europe

Nonrandomized observational study

328

Intermediate care hospital

Nurses, OT, PT & physician

75.5

56.5

4.2 (2.0)

NR

17 ADL

TCP: 1.95 (0.74)

CG: 1.95 (0.82)

NR

DelGiudice, 2009 [30]

Europe

Retrospective cohort study

375

Acute care ward

Physicians (geri, neuro, rehab, surgery and other specialists); nursing, PT, SLP, dietitian, SW & nurses

80.5

51.7

22.5%: 0–2 conditions;

73.5%: 3–5; 4.1%: 6–8 conditions

Moderate/severe: 16.3%

Low/none: 83.7%

Katz (ADL): 63.3% dependent; 36.7% self-sufficient

Lawton (IADL): Dependent: 65.1

Self-sufficient: 31

No data: 4

NR

Dixon, 2010 [31]

Europe

Case study

403

Intermediate care

PT, OT, and therapy assistants, with a large range of other staff that varies greatly.

Median: 82.14

74.2

NR

NR

BI: 15.00 (3–20)

NR

Elbourne, 2012 [32]

Europe

Case study

n = 94 service users

n = 12 staff

20 bed facility within a total care living complex

Nurses, care workers, PT, OT, SW & doctors

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

*Garåsen, 2007 [33]; Garåsen, 2008 [34]

Europe

Randomized controlled trial

142

LTCH/NH

trained nurses, general practitioners

80.6

72.2

NR

NR

ADL Score: TCP: 2.24 (0.9); CG: 2.05 (0.7)

22% lived with spouse

*Griffiths, 2001 [35]; Harris, 2005 [36]

Europe

Randomized controlled trial

176

General hospital

PT, OT, NPs, nurses, clinical nurse specialists, chiropodist, doctors, dietician, SLP, SW.

78.3

67

NR

NR

Barthel index BI = 12.3

NR

Heim, 2016 [37]

Europe

Action research project

1933

Community hospital and nursing home

Multidisciplinary team including geriatrician, geriatric trained nurses and physiotherapists

78.5

52.95

NR

NR

ADL limitations prior to admission

frail: 36.9; 29.5

non-frail: 3.3; 3.9

NR

Herfjord, 2014 [38]

Europe

parallel group Randomized controlled trial

376

LTCH/NH

physician (specialist in geriatric medicine and internal medicine/junior doctor supervised by a geriatrician), skilled nurse, physiotherapist, health care worker

83.6 (70–96)

73.2

NR

no severe dementia, delirium (but staff not specified how to assess delirium or dementia)

BI = 70.0 medical: 80.0

ortho: 56.7

NR

Hilton, 2013 [39]

Europe

Retrospective cohort study

100

LTCH/NH

Nursing, staff psychiatrist, PT, OT, psychologist. Visiting senior medical support

included a GP, a psychiatrist, and a geriatrician

82.6

65

NR

NR

NR

NR

Lee, 2011 [40]

Asia

Non-randomized intervention cohort study

245

Community hospital

“Interdisciplinary geriatric team”

82.7 (5.5)

NR

NR

MMSE: 13.4 +/− 8.1

BI: 47.1 +/− 33.6

Lawton-Brody IADL: 2.1 +/− 2.4

NR

Lee, 2012 [41]

Asia

Prospective cohort study

83

Community hospital

Interdisciplinary team

80.3

3.60%

NR

Persons with severe dementia excluded

BI 35.0 +/− 21.3

59.3% alone

Lees, 2013 [42]

Europe

Mixed methods triangulation approach

9

Purpose built interim (transitional) care unit

Nurses, geriatrician, health care assistants

75.1

40%

3–8

NR

NR

NR

Levin, 2019 [43]

Europe

Quasi experimental, interrupted time series

107,022

LTCH

Care home providers, SW, hospital ward staff, GP, community teams of allied health professionals, social housing associations

81.7 (5.7)

64.5

NR

NR

NR

NR

Likourezos, 2002 [44]

US

Prospective cohort study

164

LTCH/NH

Physicians, ethics consultation team, radiology, orthopedic, dental, eye, and other specialty clinics, PT, OT, SLP

81 (61–103)

76.8

CCI: 1.0

(0–4)

FIM Cognitive score 30 (range: 9–35)

FIM Motor score 46.5 (13–78)

NR

Luthy, 2007 [45]

Europe

Prospective cohort study

166

General medicine ward

Physicians, nurses, psychiatrists, psychologist, PT, OT & SW

74.6 (15.6)

52

CCI: 3.6 (1.9)

NR

Number of ADL impairment: 2.0 (1.9)

Number of IADL impairments: 2.8 (1.5)

55% alone

Manville, 2014 [46]

Canada

Retrospective chart review

135

Acute care hospital

Nursing, PT/OT, rehabilitation aides, nutritionist, pharmacist. FPs (with care of the elderly training),

86.4

63

CCI: 3.16

51% had dementia diagnosis

NR

55% alone

*Michael, 2005 [47]; Michael, 2004 [48]

Australia

Pre-test post-test

168

Acute care hospital

Nurses, therapy assistants, geriatrician, allied health services: pharmacy, PT, OT, SW, SLP & clinical psychology

81.38

84

NR

Persons with dementia and severe CI were excluded

BI: 87.3 (12.7)

51.8% alone

45.8% with others

Nakanishi, 2016 [49]

Asia

Retrospective cohort study

9992

Acute care hospitals, community hospitals, LTCH/NH & patients’ own homes

NR

85.4

70.5

NR

Dementia: 24.8%

 

NR

O’Brien, 2017 [50]

Canada

Pre-test post-test

49

LTCH/NH

physician, OT, PT, SW, dietician, nurse, & recreation specialist

83 (66–96)

71.4

Moderate to severe cognitive impairment Frequent, uncontrolled inappropriate behaviors were excluded

NR

BI: 54.20 (SD = 19.26)

NR

Orvik, 2016 [51]

Europe

Retrospective and prospective multimethod observational study

88

LTCH/NH

nurses, physician & PT

NR

NR

NR

Persons with dementia excluded

NR

NR

Parsons, 2002 [52]

US

Retrospective chart review

154

Acute care hospital

Physicians, nurses, pharmacists, SW, PT, OT & NPs

76

3

Average 4 comorbidities

NR

40% dependent in all ADLs; whereas 26% independent in all ADLs.

62% lived with caregivers

Richardson, 2001 [53]

Europe

Randomized controlled trial

276

Acute care hospital

Nurses, GP, OT/PT, SLP, dietician, SW, pain team, CNS

76

61

NR

NR

NR

NR

Richardson, 1986 [54]

US

Mixed/multiple methods

NR

Rural hospital

OT, PT, SLP, Hearing services, dental, SW, discharge planners

75+

NR: mostly women

NR

NR

NR

~ 50% lived alone

Steiner, 2001 [55]

Europe

Randomized controlled trial

240

Acute care hospital

Nurses, PT, doctors can be called in an emergency

72.2

49

NR

Cognitively impaired at randomisation intervention: 39/114; control 32/119

BI:

IG 63.5 (23.5); CG 60.3 (22.8)

62.4% alone

Tappen, 2001 [56]

US

Quasi-experimental repeated measures

242

SNF

Nursing, other professions NR

76.8 (SD 11.18)

74

1.92

Excluded if MMSE < 21

FIM: 84.34 (21.76)%

Katz index: 6.32 (2.89)

Lawton & Brody scale: 10.73 (4.80)

NR, but eligible if adequate cognition

Trappes-Lomax, 2006 [57]

Europe

Non-randomized controlled trial

228

LTCH/NH

Rehabilitation assistants, OT, PT, patient’s own GP provides clinical care

83.1 (7.1)

68

NR

NR

BI:

IG 74.6 (21.7)

CG 75.1 (20.9)

67.0% alone

  1. NR not reported, LTCH/NH Long term care home/nursing home, CPS Cognitive Performance Scale, CNS clinical nurse specialist, NP nurse practitioner, OT occupational therapist, PT physiotherapist, SLP speech language pathologist, SW social worker, GP general practitioner, SNF skilled nursing facility, CCI Charlson comorbidity index, FIM Functional Independence Measure, MMSE Mini Mental State Exam, STM short-term memory, CI cognitive impairment, ADL activities of daily living, IADL instrumental activities of daily living, BI Barthel Index, IG intervention group, CG control group