Skip to main content

Table 3 Association between background characteristics and reporting polyvictimization

From: Lifetime prevalence of polyvictimization among older adults in Sweden, associations with ill-heath, and the mediating effect of sense of coherence

  

One form of victimization

(n = 44, 8.2%)

Low polyvictimization

(n = 66, 12.2%)

High polyvictimization

(n = 34, 6.3%)

Exp (B)

95% CI

Exp (B)

95% CI

Exp (B)

95% CI

Age

60–85

0.97

0.92

1.03

0.97

0.93

1.01

0.96

0.90

1.02

Sex

Female

1

  

1

  

1

  

Male

2.25

1.10

4.61

0.93

0.55

1.59

1.09

0.52

2.27

Civil state

Single

3.39

1.60

7.20

1.60

0.82

3.14

1.38

0.57

3.32

Partner

1

  

1

  

1

  

Subjective

social status

1–10

1.06

0.89

1.26

0.97

0.84

1.12

0.90

0.75

1.09

Social support

No

2.15

0.94

4.93

1.60

0.74

3.45

4.77

2.08

10.94

Yes

1

  

1

  

1

  
  1. Note: Multinomial regression was used, and reference category is “no victimization” (n = 395). Included in analysis 539, missing 68, total 607. Model fit Cox & Snell R square 0.08, Nagelkerke 0.10. “Partner” = Married, co-habiting, steady relationship