Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies

From: Barriers and facilitators for shared decision making in older patients with multiple chronic conditions: a systematic review

First author

Setting

Country

Design study

Reporting focusa: Barriers (B) and/or Facilitators (F)

Perspectiveb

Participants (n)

% Female

Mean age of patients (years) (if not available: age range)

Funk [41], 2004

LTC facilities

Canada

Qualitative

B&F

Patients

100 patients

82

85

Gauthier [42], 2005

hospital

U.S.A.

Qualitative

B&F

Patients

13 patients

62

72

Naik [43], 2011

primary care

U.S.A.

Quantitative

B

Patients

100 patients

100

71

Belcher [44], 2006

primary care

U.S.A.

Qualitative

B&F

Patients

51 patients,

63

77

Chi [45], 2017

community care

U.S.A.

Quantitative

B

Patients

2017 patients

57

range 65 > 85

Dyrstad [46], 2015

hospital

Norway

Qualitative

B&F

Patients

41 patients

46

86

Ekdahl [47], 2010

hospital

Sweden

Qualitative

B&F

Patients

15 patients

67

84

Ekdahl [48], 2011

hospital

Sweden

Quantitative

B

Patients

156 patients

49

83.1

Erickson [49], 1989

community care

U.S.A.

Qualitative (case study)

B

Patients

1 patient

100

75

Petrillo [50], 2018

hospital

U.S.A.

Qualitative

F

Patients and informal caregivers

38 patients

31 informal caregivers

48 (total group)

78

Riffin [51], 2018

primary care

U.S.A.

Qualitative

B

Patients and informal caregivers

20 patients

20 informal caregivers

61

65

82

Kiselev [52], 2017

hospital & community care

Germany

Mixed methods

B&F

Patients and health professionals

283 patients

14 professionals (clinicians, nurses, therapists, psychologist, social worker)

66

unkc.

74.4

Rose [53], 2018

rehabilitation

U.K.

Mixed methods

B

Patients and health professionals

40 patients

24 professionals (rehabilitation staff)

23

unk.

83

Ferris [54], 2018

health care users and providers

U.S.A.

Qualitative

B&F

Patients, informal caregivers and health professionals

6 patients or informal caregivers

30 clinicians, health systems, and payers

unk.

unk.

Doekhie [55]

primary care

The Netherlands

Qualitative

B

Patients, informal caregivers and health professionals

19 patients

10 informal caregivers

38 professionals (clinicians, nurses, paramedics)

79

40

unk.

81.6

Puts [56], 2017

hospital

Canada

Mixed methods

B

Patients, informal caregivers and health professionals

29 patients

24 informal caregivers

28 professionals (oncologists and family physicians)

24 resp. 36

patients divided in 2 age groups: 63–79 & > 80;

Bragstad [57], 2014

hospital

U.S.A.

Qualitative

B

Informal caregivers

19 informal caregivers

68

n.a.d

Menne [58], 2008

community care

U.S.A.

Quantitative

B&F

Informal caregivers

215 informal caregivers

50

n.a.

Peacock [59], 2017

community care

Canada

Qualitative

B

Informal caregivers

18 informal caregivers

44

n.a.

Ekdahl [60],2012

hospital

Sweden

Qualitative

B&F

Health professionals

29 physicians

34

n.a.

Fried [61], 2011

primary care

U.S.A.

Qualitative

B

Health professionals

40 physicians

 

n.a.

Blaum [62], 2018

primary care & hospital

U.S.A.

Qualitative

B

Health professionals

9 general practitioners, 5 cardiologists

 

n.a.

Gopalraj [63], 2012

hospital

U.S.A.

Qualitative (case study)

B&F

Health professionals

1 patient

100

94

Milte [64], 2015

geropsychiatry inpatient unit

Australia

Quantitative

B

Health professionals

2 geriatricians

59

n.a.

Schuling [65], 2012

hospital

The Netherlands

Qualitative

B

Health professionals

13 physicians

15

n.a.

Molinari [66], 2016

geropsychiatry inpatient unit

U.S.A.

Qualitative (case study)

F

Health professionals

1 patient

0

‘late 60s’

Légaré [67], 2013

primary care

Canada

Mixed methods

B&F

Health professionals

Participants:

a) 276 home care providers

b) 7 members health care team

c) 8 managers

Participants: a) 82

b)100

c) 50

n.a.

Lindhardt [68], 2008

hospital

Sweden

Qualitative

B&F

Health professionals

8 nurses

100

n.a.

  1. a‘Reporting focus’ refers to whether the study reports about perceived barriers to and/or facilitators of SDM
  2. b‘Perspective’ refers to either the perspective of patients or informal caregivers or health professional from which the perceived barriers or facilitators are reported. Some studies describe perceived barriers or facilitators from more than one perspective
  3. cunk unknown
  4. dn.a not applicable