Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics

From: Structure and processes of emergency observation units with a geriatric focus: a scoping review

Study Country Study design Population Sample Agea Care model name
Anpalahan 2002 [36] Australia Retrospective, record review study; monocentre ≥ 70 years
General medical patients
n = 500 NR Rapid assessment medical unit
Bruun 2018 [32] Denmark Prospective, two-way factorial randomised clinical trial; monocentre ≥ 65 years
Non-trauma patients
at risk of functional decline
Group I; n = 82 Group II; n = 84 Group III; n = 86 Group IV; n = 84 78 (72–85) SSU
Chu 2007 [26] UK Prospective, observational study; monocentre ≥ 60 years n = 120 77 (60–96) Short-stay medical unit
Conroy 2014 [27] UK Prospective, pre-post study (historical cohort); monocentre ≥ 85 years n = 6895 (CG) n = 9035 (IG) NR Emergency Frailty Unit
Edmans 2013 [28] UK Prospective, randomised controlled trial; multicentre (2 locations) ≥ 70 years
Length of stay ≤72 h
ISAR score ≥ 2/6
n = 217 (CG)
n = 216 (IG)
83 (±7) Acute Medical Assessment Unit
Foo 2012 [38] Singapore Prospective, pre-post study; monocentre ≥ 65 years
Community-dwelling
No poor premorbid cognition or functionality
n = 172 (CG)
n = 315 (IG)
75 (NR) in CG
76 (NR) in IG
Emergency Department Observation Unit
Khan 1997 [29] UK Retrospective, observational study; monocentre ≥ 65 years n = 502 NR Short-stay ward
Leung 2019 [39] Hong Kong Retrospective, parallel group study; monocentre ≥ 65 years
Living alone
n = 40 (CG)
n = 150 (IG)
82.1 (±8.2) in CG
83.5 (±7.7) in IG
Frailty unit
Misch 2014 [40] Switzerland Prospective, observational delayed type cross-sectional diagnostic study; monocentre Non-trauma patients
emergency severity index score 2 or 3
non-specific complaints
n = 669 81 (72–87) Emergency Department Observation Unit
Nielsen 2018 [33] Denmark Prospective, non-randomised quasi-experimental trial; monocentre ≥ 65 years
Non-trauma
Community-dwelling
n = 231 (CG)
n = 144 (IG)
78 (±9) in CG
81 (±8) in IG
SSU
Ong 2012 [37] Australia Retrospective, case-control study; monocentre ≥ 65 years
4 most common diagnosis-related groups
n = 42 (CG)
n = 47 (IG)
80 (±8) in CG
84 (±8) in IG
Medical Assessment Unit
Silvester 2012 [30] UK Prospective system redesign study; monocentre ≥ 75 years n = 16,953 NR Frailty unit
Southerland 2018 [41] USA Retrospective, chart review study; monocentre ≥ 65 years n = 221 73 (±7) Emergency Department Observation Unit
Strøm 2017 [34] Denmark Prospective, observational study; monocentre ≥ 75 years
Non-emergent triage score internal medicine disease
n = 225 (SSU)
n = 225 (IMW)
82 (78–86) in SSU
82 (78–86) in IMW
SSU
Strøm 2018 [35] Denmark Prospective, pragmatic randomised clinical trial; monocentre ≥ 75 years
Less urgent triage score internal medicine disease
n = 208 (SSU)
n = 210 (IMW)
81 (77–86) in SSU
82 (78–86) in IMW
SSU
Taylor 2016 [31] UK Retrospective, pre-post study; monocentre >  75 years
Medical patients
n = 398 (CG)
n = 413 (IG)
85 (75–101) in CG
84 (75–101) in IG
Comprehensive Older Person’s Evaluation Zone
  1. CG Control group, IG Intervention group, IMW Internal medicine ward, NR Not reported, ISAR Identification of Senior At Risk, SSU Short-stay unit, UK United Kingdom, USA United States of America
  2. amedian (range) or mean (±standard deviation) in years