Skip to main content

Table 2 Criteria for rating the methodical quality of studies

From: Psychosocial interventions to support the mental health of informal caregivers of persons living with dementia – a systematic literature review

Criterion

Score

Design

 Randomized

1

 Controlled

1

Subjects

 Use of standardized diagnostic criteria

1

 All subjects accounted for/withdrawals noted

1

Outcomes

 Well-validated, reliable measures

2

 Questionable/unreliable outcome measures

0

Statistics

 Statistical significance considered

1

 Adjustment for multiple comparisons

1

 Evidence of sufficient power

1

Results

 Blind ratings

1

 Follow-up 6 months or beyond

1

 Good quality

> 7

 Poor quality

< 5