Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive statistics. Mean (SE) or proportions (%)

From: The paradox of aging and health-related quality of life in Asian Chinese: results from the Healthy Aging Longitudinal Study in Taiwan

Characteristics

All

Young old (< 65 y)

Old old (≥65 y)

N (%)

5664 (100.0)

1686 (29.8)

3978 (70.2)

Age (mean ± SE)**

69.6 ± 0.1

59.8 ± 0.06

73.8 ± 0.09

Sociodemographic characteristics

 Female (%)

2988 (52.8)

886 (52.6)

2102 (52.8)

 Education level**

  Illiterate

799 (14.1)

49 (2.9)

750 (18.9)

  Elementary school

2322 (41.0)

570 (33.8)

1752 (44.1)

  Middle school or higher

2539 (44.9)

1065 (63.2)

1474 (37.1)

 Employed (%)**

1433 (25.3)

783 (46.4)

650 (16.3)

 Partnered (%)**

4159 (73.4)

1438 (85.3)

2721 (68.4)

 Reside in urban area (%)

2911 (51.4)

891 (52.8)

2020 (50.8)

 Cohabitant (%)**

5155 (91.0)

1579 (93.7)

3576 (89.9)

Health-related variables

 Handgrip strength (mean ± SE)**

29.0 ± 0.1

33.1 ± 0.2

27.3 ± 0.2

 SPPB (mean ± SE)**

10.4 ± 0.03

11.4 ± 0.03

10.0 ± 0.05

 MMSE (mean ± SE)**

26.2 ± 0.05

28.0 ± 0.06

25.4 ± 0.06

 Depression (CES-D > 16; %)

318 (5.6)

98 (5.8)

220 (5.5)

HRQoL

 PCS (mean ± SE)**

46.8 ± 0.1

49.3 ± 0.2

45.7 ± 0.2

 MCS (mean ± SE)**

59.3 ± 0.1

58.7 ± 0.2

59.6 ± 0.1

  1. Kruskal–Wallis test or \( {\chi}_2^2 \) test was conducted to detect the differences between two groups (Young old, and Old old)
  2. * p-value< 0.05, ** p-value< 0.001
  3. a Urban: *City: Taipei, Changhua, Kaohsiung, Hualien *Rural: Miaoli, Yangmei, Shoufeng, Chiayi