Skip to main content

Table 1 Quality and expert appraisal of stigma instruments

From: Adaptation and preliminary psychometric properties of three self-stigma outcome measures for people living with dementia

 

Psychometric Quality Appraisald

Expert Appraisal

Scale

Reference

Content Validity

Internal Consistency

Criterion Validity

Construct Validity

Reproducibility

Responsiveness

Floor/Ceiling Effects

Interpretability

Total

Criterion 1a

Criterion 2b

Criterion 3c

Decision

Agreement

Reliability

Perceived devaluation and Discrimination Questionnaire (PDDQ)

Link, (1987) [40]

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

2

4

No

Yes

Yes

Excluded

Coming Out Proud with Mental Illness Scale (COMIS)

Corrigan et al. (2010) [41]

2

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

5

No

No

No

Excluded

Stigma Stress Scale (SSS)

Kaiser et al. (2004) [48]

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

3

Yes

Yes

Yes

Included

RĂĽsch et al. (2009) [42]

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

7

Self-stigma of mental illness scale (SSMIS)

Corrigan et al. (2006) [43]

2

1

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

5

Yes

Yes

Yes

Included

Stigma Coping Orientation Scale (SCOS)

Link et al. (1989) [49]

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

2

No

Yes

No

Excluded

Link et al. (2002) [44]

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

4

Internalised stigma of mental illness (ISMI)

Ritsher et al. (2003) [45]

2

1

1

2

0

2

0

1

1

9

No

Yes

No

Excluded

Stigma Impact Scale (SIS)

Fife & Wright, (2000) [50]

2

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

5

Yes

Yes

Yes

Included

Burgener & Berger, (2008) [20]

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

4

  1. aMeasure would not require significant changes to language that would require invalidating previous psychometric findings
  2. bMeasure is acceptable and relevant for people living with dementia
  3. cMeasures serves as a feasible outcome measure for a disclosure decision-making intervention for people living with dementia (“Who to tell, how and when?”)
  4. dmodified from Terwee et al. (2007) [19], for scoring see Stansfeld et al. (2017) [26]