Skip to main content

Table 5 Correlation between characteristics and LTCRL scores among home care workers (N = 119)

From: Developing an assessment scale for long-term care reablement literacy in home care workers in Taiwan using a modified Delphi method

Samples’ characteristics

Overall score (0–29)

Categories of LTCRL

Access/obtain (0–5)

Understand (0–4)

Process/appraise (0–11)

Apply/use (0–9)

Gender

 Male

24.86 ± 2.22

4.71 ± 0.46

3.95 ± 0.22

8.52 ± 1.36

7.67 ± 0.97

 Female

25.27 ± 2.28

4.83 ± 0.48

3.95 ± 0.22

8.76 ± 1.42

7.73 ± 1.11

Age

  < 47 years

25.56 ± 2.30

4.87 ± 0.34

3.98 ± 0.13

8.80 ± 1.53

7.91 ± 1.04

  ≥ 47 years

24.88 ± 2.21

4.75 ± 0.56

3.92 ± 0.27

8.64 ± 1.30

7.56 ± 1.10

Education level

 Below undergraduate

23.40 ± 2.00**

4.75 ± 0.48

3.92 ± 0.27

8.35 ± 1.20**

7.38 ± 1.12**

 Undergraduate and above

25.81 ± 2.28

4.85 ± 0.47

3.97 ± 0.17

9.00 ± 1.50

7.99 ± 0.98

General Chinese proficiency

 Not good

24.25 ± 2.27

4.88 ± 0.34

3.94 ± 0.25

8.06 ± 1.24*

7.38 ± 1.15

 Good/Fluent

25.34 ± 2.24

4.80 ± 0.49

3.95 ± 0.22

8.82 ± 1.41

7.78 ± 1.07

Experience of being a home care worker (years)

  < 0.5

25.76 ± 1.71

4.88 ± 0.33

3.96 ± 0.20

9.20 ± 1.26

7.72 ± 1.06

 0.5–1

25.26 ± 1.28

4.74 ± 0.45

3.95 ± 0.23

8.58 ± 0.96

8.00 ± 1.05

 1–3

25.48 ± 2.53

4.76 ± 0.44

3.97 ± 0.19

8.72 ± 1.62

8.03 ± 0.87

 3–5

25.50 ± 2.53

4.86 ± 0.36

4.00 ± 0.00

9.00 ± 1.36

7.64 ± 1.39

  > 5

24.31 ± 2.58

4.81 ± 0.64

3.91 ± 0.30

8.28 ± 1.49

7.31 ± 1.06

  1. Statistics are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Student t-test and ANOVA were used to identify differences between the LTCRL scores and sample characteristics. We divided samples into two age groups based on the average age of the participants (46.92)