Skip to main content

Table 2 Frailty characteristics stratified by setting

From: A scoping review of the Clinical Frailty Scale

 

All

Hospital

Long-term Care

Outpatient Clinic

Community

Hospital and Community

Articles n (%)

183 (100.0)

115 (63.2)

10 (5.5)

13 (7.1)

32 (17.6)

12 (6.6)

Site of CFS assessment n (%)

 # articles reporting

180

112

10

13

32

12

 On site

137 (76.1)

85 (75.9)

8 (90.0)

10 (76.9)

24 (75.0)

9 (75.0)

 Retrospectively

27 (15.0)

18 (16.1)

1 (10.0)

2 (15.4)

4 (12.5)

2 (16.7)

 On-site & retrospective

13 (7.2)

9 (8.0)

1 (10.0)

1 (7.7)

1 (3.2)

1 (8.3)

 Telephone

3 (1.7)

0

0

0

3 (9.4)

0

Times CFS assessed n (%)

 Once

173 (94.5)

110 (95.6)

10 (100.0)

11 (84.6)

29 (90.6)

12 (100.0)

 Twice

8 (80.0)

3 (33.3)

0

2 (20.0)

3 (33.3)

0

 Three times

1 (10.0)

1 (10.0)

0

0

0

0

 Four times

1 (10.0)

1 (10.0)

0

0

0

0

Person administering CFS n (%)

 # articles reporting

111

69

3

7

24

8

 Researchers

51 (45.9)

33 (47.8)

0

1 (14.3)

13 (54.1)

4 (50.0)

 Physicians

27 (24.3)

17 (24.6)

1 (10.0)

1 (14.3)

5 (20.8)

3 (37.5)

 Nurse/NP

11 (9.9)

8 (121.6)

0

0

3 (12.5)

0

 Other staffa

4 (3.6)

1 (0.9)

1 (10.0)

0

1 (4.2)

1 (12.5)

 Clinical staff not reported

4 (3.6)

1 (0.9)

1 (10.0)

2 (28.6)

0

0

 Mixed

14 (12.6)

9 (13.0)

0

3 (42.9)

1 (4.2)

0

Version of CFS used n (%)

 # articles reporting

153

96

9

9

30

9

 7-point

89 (58.2)

48 (50.0)

5 (55.6)

7 (77.8)

22 (73.3)

7 (77.8)

 8-point

6 (3.9)

5 (5.2)

0

0

1 (3.3)

0

 9-point

58 (37.9)

43 (44.8)

4 (44.4)

2 (22.2)

7 (23.3)

9 (22.2)

Frailty cut-point n (%)

 # articles reporting

58

42

1

4

9

2

 3

1 (1.7)

1 (2.4)

0

0

0

0

 4

15 (25.9)

10 (23.8)

0

3 (75.0)

2 (22.2)

0

 5

40 (68.9)

29 (69.0)

1 (100.0)

1 (25.0)

7 (77.8)

2 (100.0)

 6

2 (3.4)

2 (4.8)

0

0

0

0

Frailty prevalence %

 # articles reporting

66

44

2

4

12

4

 Range

2.4–100.0

2.4–87.5

75.6–100.0

25.0–48.0

2.9–77.0

11.1–71.0

 Median (IQR)

32.8

(21.3–51.1)

31.9

(21.3–47.7)

87.8

(N/A)

34.7

(25.6–46.5)

40.25

(16.8–54.3)

44.4

(16.5–67.3)

Reason frailty measured n (%)

 Risk stratification

85 (46.4)

61 (53.0)

6 (60.0)

5 (38.5)

8 (25.0)

4 (33.3)

 Inclusion/exclusion

14 (7.7)

5 (4.3)

0

1 (7.7)

6 (18.8)

2 (16.7)

 Comparison with other scales

7 (3.8)

3 (2.6)

0

1 (7.7)

3 (9.4)

0

 Outcome measure

9 (4.9)

6 (5.2)

0

2 (15.4)

0

1 (8.3)

 Clinical decision

3 (1.6)

3 (2.6)

0

0

0

0

 Descriptive only

33 (18.0)

20 (17.4)

2 (20.0)

2 (15.3)

7 (21.9)

2 (16.7)

 Risk stratification and comparison of scales

21 (11.5)

11 (9.6)

2 (20.0)

1 (7.7)

5 (15.6)

2 (16.7)

 Other mixed uses

10 (5.5)

6 (5.2)

0

0

0

1 (8.3)

  1. Note that as one article did not specify setting, it is only included in the “All” column
  2. aOther staff includes personnel such as paramedics, LTC staff, junior medical staff and program evaluators
  3. # number; IQR interquartile range