Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the subjects at the baseline

From: The associations of the number of medications and the use of anticholinergics with recovery from tubal feeding: a longitudinal hospital-based study

 

All subjects

Recovery group

Non-recovery group

P value

(N = 95)

(N = 36)

(N = 59)

(recovery vs. non-recovery groups)

Sex (men/women)

34/61

13/23

21/38

1.000

Age (years)

84 (61–98)

81.5 (62–96)

86 (61–98)

0.069

Number of prescribed medications

5 (0–16)

5 (0–14)

6 (0–16)

0.401

ACBs

1 (0–6)

0 (0–6)

1 (0–4)

0.654

Route of tubal feeding (nasal/gastrostomy)

62/33

26/10

36/23

0.375

Cerebrovascular disease

71 (74.7%)

28 (77.8%)

43 (72.9%)

0.635

Wasting syndrome

39 (41.1%)

16 (44.4%)

23 (39.0%)

0.669

Parkinson’s disease

10 (10.5%)

2 (5.6%)

8 (13.6%)

0.310

Barthel index

 0–20

92 (96.8%)

34 (94.4%)

58 (98.3%)

0.141

 21–40

1 (1.1%)

0 (0%)

1 (1.7%)

 

  > 40

2 (2.1%)

2 (5.6%)

0 (0%)

 

HDS-R

 0–10

84 (88.4%)

28 (77.8%)

56 (94.9%)

0.068

 11–20

7 (7.4%)

6 (16.7%)

1 (1.7%)

 

  > 20

4 (4.2%)

2 (5.6%)

2 (3.4%)

 
  1. The data are presented as the median [range] or number (%)
  2. ACBs Anticholinergic cognitive burden scale, HDS-R Hasegawa dementia rating scale-revised
  3. The recovery group represents the patients who recovered from tubal to oral feeding for all three meals per day during the observation period