Skip to main content

Table 3 Extended functional performance

From: Can in-hospital or post discharge caregiver involvement increase functional performance of older patients? A systematic review

Study Measure points

 

Lower limb Walking

Upper limb

Others

Galvin et al. 2011

 

LL-FMA, mean change (SD)

MAS, mean change (SD)

BBS, mean change (SD)

T0= baseline

 

T1- To

T2-T1

 

T1-T0

T2-T1

T1-T0

T2-T1

 

T1= 8 weeks

IG

9.5 (9.9)

1.6 (2.4)

 

11.9 (7.8)

37.9 (9.7)

22.8 (18.1)

0.9 (2.5)

 

T2= 3 months

CG

1.75 (6.3)

1.3 (5.2)

 

4.75 (6.2)

35.2 (10.8)

9 (9)

1.8 (8.5)

  

p = 0.01

p = 0.12

 

p = 0.00

p = 0.59

p = 0.02

p = 0.7

  

6MWT, mean change (SD)

     
  

T1-T0

T2-T1

      

IG

164.1 (128.7)

39.8 (55.4)

CG

47.2 (50.6

-3.5 (32.7)

 

p = 0.00

p = 0.01

Gräsel et al. 2005

 

TUG, number possible (%)

FAT, mean change (SD)

ASS, mean change (SD)

T0= after intervention

 

T0

T2

 

T2-T0

 

T2-T0

  

T1=4 weeks

IG

26 (79%)

31 (94%)

0.3 (1.5)

0.3 (1.0)

T2= 6 months

CG

23 (79%)

22 (76%)

0.2 (0.8)

0.0 (1.0)

  

p = 0.960

p = 0.044

p = 0.679

p = 0.27

Harris et al. 2010

  

MAL, mean change (SD)

GS, mean change (SD)

T0= baseline

    

T1-T0

 

T1-T0

  

T1= 4 weeks

IG

2.1 (0.72)

5.8 (3.1)

 

CG

1.0 (0.78)

3.4 (2.4)

  

p = 0.024

p = 0.034

   

CAAI, mean change (SD)

 
     

T1-T0

    

IG

20.6 (6.1)

CG

15.0 (7.3)

 

p = 0.021

van den Berg et al. 2016

 

LL-FMA, mean (95% CI)

 

BBS, mean (95% CI)

T0= baseline

 

T0

T1

T2

  

T0

T1

T2

T1= 8 weeks

IG

19.4 (16.3 - 22.6)

26.1 (23 - 29.2)

26.1 (22.9 - 29.2)

31.8 (26 - 37.6)

50.2 (44.3 - 56)

49.8 (43.9 - 55.6)

T2= 12 weeks

CG

17.2 (14.8 - 19.7)

22.4 (19.3 - 24.9)

27.6 (24.9 - 30.3)

26.7 (22.1 - 31.3)

44.3 (39.7 - 49)

46.3 (41.6 - 51)

  

p = 0.2654

p = 0.0721

p = 0.4577

p = 0.1752

p = 0.1275

p = 0.3681

  

TUG, mean (95% CI)

 

SISmob, mean (95% CI)

  

T0

T1

T2

  

T0

T1

T2

IG

34.2 (28.6 - 39.8)

18.2 (12.6 - 23.8)

17.5 (11.9 - 23.2)

44.8 (36.8 - 52.8)

82.3 (74.3 - 90.3)

82.5 (74.5 - 90.4)

CG

44.2 (39.7 - 48.7)

17.5 (12.9 - 22.1)

14.1 (9.2 - 19)

43.1 (36.8 - 49.4)

72.5 (66 - 78.9)

74.7 (68.2 - 81.2)

 

p = 0.0075

p = 0.8503

p = 0.3704

p = 0.7342

p = 0.06

p = 0.1382

    

RMI, mean (95% CI)

       

T0

T1

T2

IG

7.7 (6.3 - 9.1)

12.6 (11.2 - 14)

12.6 (11.2 - 14)

CG

6.8 (5.6 - 7.9)

11.6 (10.5 - 12.8)

12 (10.8 - 13.1)

 

p = 0.2937

p = 0.284

p = 0.5245

    

MI, mean (95% CI)

       

T0

T1

T2

IG

66.5 (60.1 - 72.9)

78.5 (72.1 - 84.9)

78.9 (72.5 - 85.3)

CG

62.4 (57.4 - 67.5)

74.2 (69.1 - 79.3)

83.5 (78.2 - 88.8)

 

p = 0.3291

p = 0.3058

p = 0.2814

  1. IG Intervention Group, CG Control Group, LL-FMA Lower Limb Fugl Meyer Assessment, TUG Timed Up and Go test, MAS Motor Assessment Scale, FAT Frenchay Arm Test, MAL Motor activity Log, CAAI Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory, BBS Berg Balance Scale, 6MWT 6 minute walk test, ASS Ashworth Spasticity Scale, GS grip strength, SISmob Stroke Impact Scale mobility part, RMI Rivermead Mobility Index, MI Motricity Index