Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of study participants

From: The stability of care preferences following acute illness: a mixed methods prospective cohort study of frail older people

Characteristic

All participants (n = 82)1

Participants who contributed qualitative interviews2 (n = 17)

Age (median (Interquartile range (IQR)))

84 (79–89)

82 (81–86)

Gender

 Male n (%)

30 (37)

8 (47)

 Female n (%)

52 (63)

9 (53)

Number of hospital admissions (median (IQR))

 In 6 months prior to study

2 (1–3)

1 (1–3)

 During study

1 (0–2)

1 (0–2)

Elixhauser comorbidity score (median (IQR))

3 (2–5)

4 (3–5)

Presence of cognitive impairment3 n (%)

19 (23)

4 (22)

CFS4 (median (IQR))

 Baseline

6 (5–6)

6 (5–7)

 12 weeks

6 (5–6)

6 (5–6)

 24 weeks

6 (5–6)

6 (5–7)

AKPS5(median (IQR))

 Baseline

50 (50–60)

50 (50–60)

 12 weeks

60 (50–60)

60 (50–60)

 24 weeks

60 (50–60)

50 (40–60)

Income status n (%)

 Living comfortably on current income

41 (50)

9 (53)

 Coping on current income

32 (39)

8 (47)

 Difficult on current income

4 (5)

0 (0)

 Very difficult on current income

1 (1)

0 (0)

 Don’t know

2 (2)

0 (0)

 Prefer not to say

2 (2)

0 (0)

Religious n (%)

 Yes

60 (73)

10 (59)

 No

21 (26)

7 (419)

 Missing

1 (1)

0 (0)

Living status n (%)

 Lives alone

43 (52.4)

8 (47)

 Lives with someone

39 (47.6)

9 (53)

Ethnicity n (%)

 White British

70 (85)

17 (100)

 White other

2 (2)

0 (0)

 Irish

3 (4)

0 (0)

 Caribbean

4 (5)

0 (0)

 African

1 (1)

0 (0)

 Other

1 (1)

0 (0)

 Missing

1 (1)

0 (0)

  1. 190 participants consented, but 8 required a proxy respondent and could not answer the preferences questions. Details of the 82 participants who answered the baseline survey are reported here. 2One participant was sampled for qualitative interviews but was unable to complete. 3Includes dementia, delirium, and cognitive impairment without formal diagnosis. 4CFS = Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale 5AKPS = Australian modified Karnofsky Performance Status