Skip to main content

Table 4 Enablers and barriers of the PECAN implementation strategy

From: Implementation of a complex intervention to improve participation in older people with joint contractures living in nursing homes: a process evaluation of a cluster-randomised pilot trial

Categories

Enablers

Barriers

Overall strategy

• Stepwise training of facilitators (i.e., facilitators’ workshop, peer-mentor visit, peer-mentoring via telephone) (F)

• Lack of systematic involvement of all the different stakeholders (i.e., management, social workers, relatives, and therapists) (F, R, T, SW)

• Clear defined PECAN content (F)

• Available time period too short to complete implementation (F)

• Personal contact initiated by the management or the facilitators to provide the different stakeholders with information on PECAN (T, F)

• Difficulties in the implementation for residents with severe physical and cognitive impairment (F)

Facilitators’ workshop

• Practical elements (e.g., training on the use of technical and medical aids) (M)

• Unbalanced ratio between theory and practice (i.e., more active participation during workshop required) (F, RT)

Information session

• Use of plain language when addressing the different participant groups (RT)

• Lack of systematic involvement of the nursing staff (e.g., no presentation within the nursing team) (F)

• Diverse groups of participants could be reached and informed about PECAN in one session (F, SW)

• Invitation to the session (i.e., poster at the entrance area) did not reached all potential participants (F, T, R, SW, RT)

Peer-mentoring

• The peer-mentor visit was highlighted as a useful introduction to the implementation of PECAN (F)

• Facilitators were usually not directly available via e-mail or telephone (e.g., appointments via the head nurse were necessary) (F, PM)

• Continuous availability of the peer-mentors via telephone (F)

• Standardised procedure of peer-mentoring via telephone (F, PM)

 - Routines for communication and regular appointments (F, PM)

 - Specific objectives based on the last counselling (PM)

Supportive materials

• Supportive materials tailored for the target population (F, T, SW)

 - Training folder for facilitators (F)

 - Posters for the nursing wards (T, SW, F)

 - Materials for nursing team training (F)

 - Specific leaflets for relatives, therapists and physicians (F)

 - Article regarding PECAN published in nursing home journal (SW)

• Lack of supportive materials with a simple and practical design (F, R)

• Lack of supportive materials to guide the implementation (e.g., no standardised documentation forms, no overview of potential intervention measures) (F)

• Leaflets should have more focus on personal tasks (R)

• Supportive materials did not reach the targeted population (R, T, SW)

 - Posters or other reminders in the nursing wards were not noticed (R)

 - Leaflets were not handed out (R, T, SW)

  1. Abbreviations: RT research team, F facilitators, R relatives, T therapists, SW social workers, PM peer-mentors
  2. Data base: Statements from the research team based on documentation forms (2 protocols for the facilitators’ workshop, 2 protocols for the information session); statements from the facilitators based on problem-centred interviews (9 participants) and one group discussion (4 participants); statements from relatives (5 participants), therapists (4 participants) and social workers (4 participants) based on problem-centred interviews; statements from the peer-mentors based on problem-centred interviews (2 participants)