Skip to main content

Table 3 The effect of RAPS on generic ADL (Models A1–3 N = 128; Models B1–3 N = 130)

From: Longitudinal association between housing accessibility and activities of daily living: the role of self-efficacy and control in people ageing with Parkinson’s disease

 

Model A1

Model A2

Model A3

Model B1

Model B2

Model B3

 

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

RAPS, T1

1.02 (0.96–1.09)

1.02 (0.96–1.09)

1.32 (0.96–1.81)

1.02 (0.96–1.09)

1.03 (0.97–1.09)

1.76 (1.09–2.81)*

Functional limitations, T1

2.4 (1.75–3.28)***

2.29 (1.66–3.15)***

2.31 (1.68–3.2)***

2.41 (1.76–3.3)***

2.5 (1.77–3.53)***

2.9 (1.9–4.41)***

External HCB, T1

 

1.04 (0.99–1.09)

1.05 (0.99–1.11)

   

RAPS*External HCB

  

0.99 (0.99–1.00)

   

GSE, T1

    

0.89 (0.81–0.98)*

0.88 (0.8–0.97)**

RAPS*GSE

     

0.98 (0.97–1.00)*

R square

0.35

0.36

0.37

0.35

0.38

0.41

  1. Note. RAPS relative accessibility problem score; ADL activities of daily living; HCB housing-related control beliefs; GSE general self-efficacy; OR odds ratio; CI confidence interval
  2. * p-value ≤0.05 level (2-tailed); ** p-value ≤0.01 level (2-tailed); *** p-value ≤0.001 level (2-tailed)