Skip to main content

Table 5 Administering Nurse: Perceived Feasibility and Acceptability (Median Rating/10) by Instrument (n = 5)

From: Feasibility and acceptability of commonly used screening instruments to identify frailty among community-dwelling older people: a mixed methods study

InstrumentTimeSpaceEquipmentSkillAcceptability (Patient)Acceptability (Nurse)
 Median (Q1 – Q3)Median (Q1 – Q3)Median (Q1 – Q3)Median (Q1 – Q3)Median (Q1 – Q3)Median (Q1 – Q3)
P710.0 (9.5–10.0)10.0 (8.25–10.0)10.0 (9.5–10.0)10.0 (9.5–10.0)9.0 (7.5–10.0)10.0 (8.5–10.0)
EFS8.0 (6.5–8.0)6.0 (5.5–7.0)7.0 (5.5–8.0)8.0 (6.5–10.0)8.0 (5.5–8.0)9.0 (8.5–9.5)
FQ10.0 (8.5–10.0)9.0 (8.25–10.0)10.0 (9.5–10.0)10.0 (9.5–10.0)6.0 (6.0–9.5)9.0 (8.5–10.0)
GST8.0 (8.0–9.0)7.0 (5.5–7.75)8.0 (6.5–8.5)9.0 (8–10.0)7.0 (7.0–9.0)10.0 (9.0–10.0)
GFI8.0 (7.0–8.0)9.0 (9.0–10.0)10.0 (9.5–10.0)10.0 (8.5–10.0)8.0 (7.5–9.0)9.0 (7.0–10.0)
KC6.0 (5.5–7.5)9.5 (9.0–10.0)10.0 (9.5–10.0)9.5 (7.5–10.0)7.0 (6.5–7.5)9.0 (7.5–10.0)
REFS7.0 (6.0–7.5)10.0 (9.0–10.0)10.0 (9.5–10.0)10.0 (9.25–10.0)a8.0 (7.5–8.0)a9.5 (8.25–10.0)
  1. Abbreviations: P7 PRISMA-7, FQ Frail Questionnaire, GAIT Gait Speed Test, GFI Groningen Frailty Indicator, GST Gait Speed Test, EFS Edmonton Frail Scale, KC Kihon Checklist, REFS Reported Edmonton Frail Scale. a Due to missing data, n = 4 for these rankings; data was adjusted accordingly
\