Skip to main content

Table 2 Key barriers and implications

From: The benefits of and barriers to using a social robot PARO in care settings: a scoping review

Barriers Implications
Cost and workload
• High cost
• Staff workload
Consider shared use of the robot to serve a larger group of population in care settings
Involve healthcare professionals in co-developing strategies to fit workflow, improve effectiveness, and meet clinical needs
Infection concerns
• Sharing and spreading disease
Engage infection control practitioners, leadership, and frontline to develop practice guidelines and protocols
Provide training and ongoing support to ensure staff understand how to clean the robot and follow infection prevention procedures
Stigma and ethical issues
• Robot replacing human
• Reducing human contact
• Objectification
• Infantilizing
• Deception
Avoid the ‘human vs robot’ thinking, technology should complement but not replace the care provided by clinicians
Learn the person’s biography and apply a person-centered approach
Work with frontline and leaders in organizations to clarify the role of the robot and find out how the robot can be used most effectively
Investigate if the robot works with people with different stages and types of dementia, gender, ethnic and cultural backgrounds