Skip to main content

Table 1 Constructs included in the Wearable Technology Acceptance in Health Care (WTAH) survey

From: Acceptability of a lifelogging wearable camera in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a mixed-method study

Performance Expectancy (PE) The degree to which using this technology will bring effectiveness to users in performing daily activities
Hedonic Motivation (HM) The pleasure or enjoyment derived from adopting and using the technology
Effort Expectancy (EE) The degree of ease related to the patient’s use of the technology
Functional Congruence (FC) Product quality in terms of comfort, fashion and reasonable pricing
Self-Efficacy (SE) The patient’s capacity to use the wearable device to self-monitor and self-manage their memory functioning
Social Influence (SI) The extent to which the patient’s decision-making is influenced by others’ perceptions
Perceived Vulnerability (PV) The possibility of the patient experiencing memory problems
Perceived Severity (PS) The extent of the threat from behaviour that is unhealthy for memory and the importance of following medical prescriptions that are good for memory
Perceived Privacy Risk (PPR) The patient’s perceptions of risk when professionals attempt to collect, use, and distribute information about them and their behaviour
Behavioural Intention (BI) The intention to use the device in the future
  1. Adapted from Gao [22]