The scientific evidence for a potential link between confusion and urinary tract infection in the elderly is still confusing - a systematic literature review
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Nov 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Jan 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - CJ Crnich|
|13 May 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David A Nace|
|3 Jul 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Sean Mayne|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Jul 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Oct 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - CJ Crnich|
|20 Jan 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Sean Mayne|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Jan 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Jan 2019||Editorially accepted|
|4 Feb 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12877-019-1049-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.