Skip to main content

Table 3 Results from hierarchical OLS regression analyses

From: The influence of organizational factors on the attitudes of residential care staff toward the sexuality of residents with dementia

 

Model 1

 

Model 2

 

Model 3

 

Model 4

 

Predictors

SE

β

SE

β

SE

β

SE

β

 

F (1,182) 24.39, R2(A. R2) 0.12 (0.11)

     

Knowledge

.12

.34***

0.11

0.26***

0.11

0.33***

0.16

0.26**

   

F (6,171) 8.62, R2(A. R2) 0.23 (0.20)

    

Age

  

0.13

−0.11

.013

0.06

0.19

−0.05

Level of education

 Low vocational

  

3.33

0.12

3.60

0.02

4.62

−0.02

 Average vocational (ref.)

  

 High vocational

  

2.91

−0.21***

3.15

−0.24***

3.84

−0.22**

 High

  

2.85

−0.26***

5.29

−0.23*

6.26

−0.20

Years of tenure

  

0.15

0.06

0.16

−0.08

0.21

−0.06

     

F (16,143) 5.67, R2(A. R2) 0.39 (0.32)

  

Employer

 A

    

3.55

0.11

4.13

0.13

 B

    

3.16

0.22***

4.42

0.04

 C

    

4.44

0.89

5.20

0.11

 D (ref.)

    

 E

    

3.62

0.14

4.63

0.17

 F

    

4.45

0.18**

5.33

0.19

Policy

    

2.43

0.26***

3.09

0.25**

Function

 Caregivers (ref.)

    

 HCP

    

5.65

−0.10

6.33

−0.10

 Other

    

4.38

0.11

5.26

0.23*

Sexual education

 None (ref.)

    

 one

    

3.62

−0.06

5.02

−0.05

  > one

    

6.01

−0.06

7.69

−0.08

       

F (23,95) 3.02, R2(A. R2) 0.42 (0.28)

Person-centered care

      

0.27

−0.23**

Org. culture a

 D. support

      

0.37

−0.22*

 D. innovative

      

0.43

0.17

 D. goal

      

0.45

−0.00

 E. support

      

0.48

0.12

 E. innovative

      

0.77

−0.01

 E. goal

      

0.57

−0.22

  1. *p < .1
  2. **p < .05
  3. ***p < .01
  4. aD. = descriptive perspective and corresponding variable, E. = evaluative perspective and corresponding variable