Skip to main content

Table 3 Multilevel Analysis for Differences between Patients in the Two Cohorts at 3 and 9-Month Follow-up (n = 149)

From: The effectiveness of an integrated care pathway in geriatric rehabilitation among older patients with complex health problems and their informal caregivers: a prospective cohort study

 

3-month follow-up

Mean (SD) a

Adj. mean differenceb

(95% CI)

p-value

9-month follow-up

Mean (SD) a

Adj. mean differenceb

(95% CI)

p-value

Primary outcome measure

CUC; n = 26

CPC; n = 75

n = 147

 

CUC; n = 19

CPC; n = 68

n = 147

 

Dependence in activities of daily living (KATZ-15; range 0-15c)

5.7 (2.8)

4.6 (2.4)

−0.51 (−1.60, 0.59)

0.360

5.0 (3.0)

4.4 (2.9)

−0.14 (− 1.41, 1.12)

0.862

Secondary outcome measures

 Extended daily activities (FAI; range 15–60)

27.4 (9.7)

31.1 (9.4)

4.14 (0.86, 7.42)

0.014†

29.4 (11.2)

31.0 (9.4)

1.84 (−1.58, 5.26)

0.288

 Social participation (IPA; range 12–60)

31.0 (6.2)

28.9 (6.8)

−1.20 (−4.28, 1.88)

0.441

30.8 (8.0)

30.8 (8.3)

−0.27 (−4.70, 4.16)

0.903

 Psychological well-being (Subscale RAND-36; range 5–30)

22.8 (5.0)

23.7 (4.7)

−0.53 (−2.61, 1.54)

0.610

22.8 (6.3)

22.9 (5.6)

−0.91 (−3.67, 1.94)

0.529

 Quality of life (CSAL; range 0–100)

67.9 (14.1)

70.7 (9.4)

4.95 (−2.17, 12.08)

0.171

71.4 (9.2)

68.9(16.4)

1.54 (−7.29, 10.37)

0.730

  1. CUC Care as Usual Cohort, CPC Care Pathway Cohort, KATZ-15 modified version of the Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living, FAI Frenchay Activities Index, IPA Impact on Participation and Autonomy, CSAL Cantril’s Self Anchoring Ladder
  2. †Statistically significant (p-value < 0.05)
  3. aUnadjusted means
  4. bAdjusted for age, sex, living situation, educational level, multi-morbidity and the interaction term “group*time”
  5. cThe underlined score represents the most favorable score