Skip to main content

Table 3 Overview of process evaluation data collection

From: Effects, costs and feasibility of the ‘Stay Active at Home’ Reablement training programme for home care professionals: study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial

Component and definition

Data source

Arm

Data collection method

Specific dataa

Timing

Implementation

Fidelity

Quality of what is delivered

Professionals and other stakeholders (e.g. interventionists, managers)

IG

Semi-structured (group) interviews

– a.o. experienced benefits, burden, usefulness of ‘Stay Active at Home’; involvement with intervention

At the end of the implementation phase

Older adults

IG, CG

Telephone interviews

– a.o. satisfaction with home care and awareness of behavioural change in professionals

6 months after baseline (with data for effect and economic evaluation)

Researchers

IG

Project logbook

– Performance according to protocol

Continuously throughout the implementation phase

Dose

Quantity of what is delivered

Professionals

IG

Registration forms and checklists

– Number of professionals: attending programme meetings; making practical assignments; reading weekly newsletters

Continuously throughout the implementation phase

Older adults

IG

Client records

– a.o. hours of care; staff turn-over trained professionals; formulation and implementation of goal-setting and action planning

At the end of the implementation phase

Adaptations

Alterations made to the intervention

Researchers

IG

Project logbook

– if applicable: changes in content, procedures, activities and processes

Continuously throughout the implementation phase

Reach

Extent to which the target group was reached

Professionals

IG

Project logbook

– Number of professionals who will refuse, drop out or complet the programme and reasons for refusal and drop-out

Continuously throughout the implementation phase

Older adults

IG

Project logbook

– Number of older adults who will refuse, drop out or complete the programme and reasons for refusal and drop-out

Continuously throughout the implementation phase

Mechanisms of impact

 Mechanisms that are expected to produce change

Professionals

IG, CG

Self-report questionnaire

– Knowledge test and self-efficacy and outcome expectation questionnaire inspired by the work of Resnick et al. [75,76,77]

– Additional evaluation questions (which cover the different topics of the programme)

6 and 12 months after baseline

Older adults

IG, CG

Self-report questionnaire

– Self-efficacy and outcome expectation questionnaire inspired by the work of Resnick et al. [78]

6 and 12 months after baseline (with data for effect and economic evaluation)

Contextual factors

 Factors that may influence the implementation/ outcomes of the intervention

Professionals and other stakeholders (e.g. interventionists, managers)

IG

Semi-structured (group) interviews

– a.o. facilitators and barriers in applying ‘Stay Active at Home’ in practice

At the end of the implementation phase

Researchers

IG

Project logbook

– a.o. facilitators and barriers in applying ‘Stay Active at Home’

Continuously throughout the implementation phase

  1. IG intervention group, CG control group
  2. aNeed to be further specified