Skip to main content

Table 5 Descriptive and Linear Mixed Model Analysis of MTS Summative Global Scores At Each Time Point By Home Area

From: Mixed methods developmental evaluation of the CHOICE program: a relationship-centred mealtime intervention for long-term care

Time Point (weeks)

Descriptives by dining room

Mixed model analysis with interaction

Summative Scale Scores, Mean (SD)a

Effect

p-valueb

Wellesley

Parker

 

Physical Environment

Physical Environment

0

5.2 (0.84)

4.8 (0.45)

Dining Room

0.37

8

5.6 (0.89)

4.6 (0.89)

Time

< 0.01

16

4.6 (0.55)

5.2 (0.45)

Dining Room x Time

0.09

24

6.2 (0.84)

6.2 (0.45)

  
 

Social Environment

Social Environment

0

5.4 (1.14)

4.4 (0.55)

Dining Room

0.04

8

4.4 (0.55)

4.6 (0.89)

Time

0.02

16

3.0 (1.00)

5.6 (1.14)

Dining Room x Time

< 0.01

24

5.2 (1.30)

6.0 (0.71)

  
 

Relationship-Centred Care

Relationship-Centred Care

0

4.4 (1.14)

4.2 (0.45)

Dining Room

0.15

8

5.0 (0.71)

4.8 (0.84)

Time

0.40

16

3.8 (1.30)

5.6 (0.55)

Dining Room x Time

0.09

24

4.8 (1.30)

5.2 (1.10)

  
 

Overall Quality of Dining Environment

Overall Quality of Dining Environment

0

4.8 (0.84)

4.2 (0.45)

Dining Room

0.41

8

5.0 (0.71)

4.6 (0.89)

Time

0.02

16

4.2 (0.84)

5.6 (0.55)

Dining Room x Time

0.02

24

5.4 (0.89)

5.8 (0.84)

  
  1. an = 5 observations per time point per dining room
  2. bP-values from type 3 test of fixed effects