Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Montreal cognitive assessment reflects cognitive reserve

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Jun 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Charles Watson
12 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gary J. Kennedy
14 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ahmet Turan Isik
23 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Jae Myeong Kang
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Charles Watson
10 Jul 2018 Author responded Author comments - Jae Myeong Kang
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Jul 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
11 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Jae Myeong Kang
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
17 Oct 2018 Editorially accepted
30 Oct 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12877-018-0951-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement