Skip to main content

Table 2 Frailty charactseristics of included articles

From: What do we know about frailty in the acute care setting? A scoping review

 

All

Geriatrics

Emergency Department

General Medicine

Cardiology

Orthopedics

Intensive Care Unit

Oncology

Surgery

Prehospital

General Medicine & Surgery

General Medicine & Geriatrics

Geriatrics & Oncology

Articles n (%)

240 (100)

29 (12.1)

29 (12.1)

22 (9.2)

20 (8.3)

11 (4.6)

9 (3.8)

6 (3)

5 (2.1)

2 (0.8)

18 (7.5)

7 (2.9)

2 (0.8)

When was frailty measured n (%)

 At admission

94 (46.1)

15 (51.7)

18 (62.1)

12 (54.5)

6 (30.0)

3 (27.3)

5 (55.6)

3 (50.0)

3 (60.0)

0

3 (16.7)

6 (85.7)

1 (50.0)

 During hospitalization

34 (16.7)

9 (31.0)

3 (10.3)

5 (22.7)

4 (20.0)

2 (18.2)

1 (11.1)

2 (33.3)

0

1 (50.0)

3 (16.7)

0

0

 At discharge

10 (4.9)

1 (3.4)

1 (3.4)

0

3 (15.0)

0

1 (11.1)

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Mixeda

13 (6.4)

1 (3.4)

3 (10.3)

2 (9.0)

0

1 (9.1)

0

1 (16.7)

0

0

0

1 (14.3)

0

 Chart/Database review

27 (13.2)

3 (10.3)

3 (10.3)

2 (9.1)

6 (30.0)

3 (27.3)

2 (22.2)

0

1 (20.0)

1 (50.0)

1 (5.6)

0

0

 Not reported

26 (12.7)

0

1 (3.4)

1 (4.5)

1 (5.0)

2 (18.2)

0

0

1 (20.0)

0

11 (61.1)

0

1 (50.0)

Number of frailty measures used n (%)

 1

185 (90.7)

25 (86.2)

27 (93.1)

21 (95.5)

16 (80.0)

8 (72.7)

8 (88.9)

6 (100.0)

4 (80.0)

2 (100.0)

18 (100.0)

7 (100.0)

2 (100.0)

 2

9 (4.4)

3 (10.3)

0

0

4 (20.0)

0

1 (11.1)

0

0

0

0

0

0

 3

5 (2.5)

0

2 (6.9)

1 (4.5)

0

2 (18.2)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 4

4 (2.0)

1 (3.4)

0

0

0

1 (9.1)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 6

1 (0.5)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1 (20.0)

0

0

0

0

Type of frailty measure n (%)

 Established frailty tools

123 (51.3)

17 (48.6)

17 (51.5)

17 (70.8)

16 (66.7)

6 (33.3)

9 (90.0)

3 (50.0)

6 (60.0)

1 (50.0)

0

6 (85.7)

1 (50.0)

 Non-frailty toolsb

57 (23.8)

11 (31.4)

13 (39.4)

4 (16.7)

3 (12.5)

10 (55.6)

0

1 (16.7)

4 (40.0)

0

1 (5.6)

0

0

 Ad hoc measuresc

56 (23.3)

6 (17.1)

3 (9.1)

3 (12.5)

4 (16.7)

2 (11.1)

1 (10.0)

2 (33.3)

0

1 (50.0)

15 (83.3)

1 (14.3)

1 (50.0)

 Clinical judgment

4 (1.7)

1 (2.9)

0

0

1 (4.2)

0

0

0

0

0

2 (11.1)

0

0

Frailty Measure used n (%)

 Established frailty tools

  Clinical Frailty Scale

28 (11.7)

6 (17.1)

4 (12.1)

4 (16.7)

3 (12.5)

0

6 (60.0)

0

0

0

0

0

0

  Frailty Phenotype

28 (11.7)

2 (5.7)

4 (12.1)

4 (16.7)

6 (25.0)

1 (5.6)

2 (20.0)

0

2 (20.0)

0

0

1 (14.3)

0

  Frailty Index

28 (11.7)

3 (8.6)

7 (21.2)

4 (16.7)

1 (4.2)

4 (22.2)

1 (10.0)

0

1 (10.0)

1 (50.0)

0

1 (14.3)

0

  Edmonton Frailty Scale

10 (4.2)

0

2 (6.1)

2 (8.3)

2 (8.3)

1 (5.6)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

  Winodgrad Index

7 (2.9)

0

0

1 (4.2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

4 (57.1)

0

  Balducci criteria

5 (2.1)

0

0

0

0

0

0

3 (50.0)

1 (10.0)

0

0

0

1 (50.0)

  Rockwood Geriatric Frailty Status

5 (2.1)

2 (5.7)

0

0

1 (4.2)

0

0

0

1 (10.0)

0

0

0

0

  Study of Osteoporotic Fracture Index

3 (1.3)

2 (5.7)

0

1 (4.2)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

  Tilburg Frailty Indicator

3 (1.3)

0

0

1 (4.2)

2 (8.3)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

  FRAIL scale

2 (0.8)

1 (2.9)

0

0

1 (4.2)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

  Groningen Frailty Indicator

2 (0.8)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1 (10.0)

0

0

0

0

  Other established toolsd

2 (0.8)

1 (2.9)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Non-frailty toolsb

  Identification of Seniors at Risk

12 (5.0)

4 (11.4)

3 (9.1)

2 (8.3)

1 (4.2)

1 (5.6)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

  Vulnerable Elders Survey

5 (2.1)

0

3 (9.1)

0

0

0

0

0

1 (10.0)

0

0

0

0

  Grip strength

4 (1.7)

2 (5.7)

0

0

0

1 (5.6)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

  Barthel Index

2 (0.8)

0

2 (6.1)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

  Life Space Assessment

2 (0.8)

0

2 (6.1)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

  Multidimensional Prognosis Index

2 (0.8)

2 (5.7)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

  Short Physical Performance Battery

2 (0.8)

1 (2.9)

0

0

0

0

0

1 (16.7)

0

0

0

0

0

  Other non-frailty toolse

28 (11.7)

2 (5.7)

3 (9.1)

2 (9.1)

2 (8.3)

8 (44.4)

0

0

3 (30.0)

0

1 (5.6)

0

0

 Ad hoc measuresc

  GEM criteriaf

12 (5.0)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

12 (66.7)

0

0

  Other ad hoc measures

44 (18.3)

6 (17.1)

3 (9.1)

3 (12.5)

4 (16.7)

2 (11.1)

1 (10.0)

2 (33.3)

0

1 (50.0)

3 (16.7)

1 (14.3)

1 (50.0)

 Clinical judgment

4 (1.7)

1 (2.9)

0

0

1 (4.2)

0

0

0

0

0

2 (11.1)

0

0

Purpose of frailty use n (%)

 Risk stratificationg

89 (43.6)

12 (41.4)

15 (51.7)

10 (45.5)

11 (55.0)

8 (72.7)

8 (88.9)

2 (33.3)

2 (40.0)

1 (50.0)

3 (16.7)

2 (28.6)

0

 Inclusion/Exclusion criterion

41 (20.1)

4 (13.8)

3 (10.3)

4 (18.2)

1 (5.0)

0

0

0

1 (20.0)

1 (50.0)

13 (72.2)

5 (71.4)

0

 Outcome measure

4 (2.0)

1 (3.4)

1 (3.4)

0

1 (5.0)

1 (9.1)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Mixedh

3 (1.5)

0

0

2 (9.0)

0

0

0

1 (16.7)

0

0

0

0

0

 Only descriptivei

67 (32.8)

12 (41.4)

10 (34.5)

6 (27.3)

7 (35.0)

2 (18.2)

1 (11.1)

3 (50.0)

2 (40.0)

0

2 (11.1)

0

2 (100.0)

Prevalence of frailty (%)

 # of articles reporting

122

17

13

12

17

5

8

5

7

0

4

2

1

 Range

1.1–100

1.1–90.0

6.9–78.0

23.0–77.9

4.7–77.8

11.4–89.4

13.7–100

19.1–96.7

29.3–79.9

N/A

30.3–91.0

41.4–59.0

26.0

 Median (IQR)

48.5 (32.0–69.5)

43.3 (26.9–70.7)

46.7 (34.2–70.2)

51.3 (34.8–55.2)

35.5 (28.7–69)

68.5 (31.2–89.4)

33.5 (25.3–47.0

41.4 (26.7–81.0)

54.3 (50.0–70.7)

N/A

45.3 (32.2–81.4)

N/A

N/A

Adverse outcomes predicted by frailty [n predicted/total measured (% predictive)]j

 All adverse outcomes

169/228 (74.1)

23/30 (69.7)

25/32 (78.1)

18/22 (81.8)

15/19 (78.9)

11/16 (68.8)

22/33 (66.7)

4/8 (50)

11/14 (78.6)

1/1 (100)

4/4 (100)

2/3 (66.7)

0

 Mortality

58/69 (84.1)

13/14 (92.9)

6/7 (85.7)

4/4 (100.0)

7/10 (70.0)

4/5 (80.0)

6/8 (75.0)

1/2 (50.0)

6/7 (85.7)

1/1 (100.0)

0

0

0

 Length of stay

24/33 (72.7)

3/5 (60.0)

4/5 (80.0)

4/7 (57.1)

2/2 (100.0)

3/3 (100.0)

3/6 (50.0)

0

0

0

1/1 (100.0)

2/2 (100.0)

0

 In-hospital complications

20/29 (69.0)

0

2/2 (100.0)

0

2/2 (100.0)

1/4 (25.0)

1/3 (33.3)

1/2 (50.0)

5/7 (71.4)

0

1/1 (100.0)

0

0

 Institutionalization

27/29 (93.1)

1/1 (100.0)

6/6 (100.0)

7/7 (100.0)

1/1 (100.0)

1/1 (100.0)

5/7 (71.4)

1/1 (100.0)

0

0

0

0

0

 Rehospitalization

9/18 (50.0)

3/4 (75.0)

3/5 (60.0)

0/1 (0)

1/1 (100.0)

0

0/1 (0)

0

0

0

1/1 (100.0)

0

0

 Functional decline

8/8 (66.7)

2/2 (100.0)

2/4 (50.0)

1/1 (100.0)

0

0

3/3 (100.0)

0

0

0

0

0/1 (0)

0

 Treatment changek

8/8 (66.7)

1/1 (100.0)

0/1 (0)

0

2/3 (66.7)

0

2/3 (66.7)

0/1 (0)

0

0

1/1 (100.0)

0

0

 Falls

3/7 (42.9)

0/4 (0)

1/1 (100.0)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Delirium

1/4 (25.0)

0/2 (0)

0

1/1 (100.0)

0

0/1 (0)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Treatment responsel

4/4 (100.0)

0

0

1/1 (100.0)

0

0

0

1/1 (100.0)

0

0

0

0

0

 Cognitive decline

0/3 (0)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Quality of life

2/2 (100.0)

0

0

0

0

1/1 (100.0)

1/1 (100.0)

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Otherm

5/6 (83.3)

0

1/2 (50.0)

0

0

1/1 (100.0)

1/1 (100.0)

0

0

0

0

0

0

  1. We only stratified by disciplines that have been included in at least 2 articles
  2. N/A not applicable, # number, IQR interquartile range
  3. aMultiple testings for each patient or different testing times for subgroup of patients
  4. bTools that were not developed specifically for measuring frailty
  5. cOperationalized definitions of frailty (for example, ≥65 years of age plus 3 comorbidities)
  6. dClinical Global Impression of Change in Physical Frailty; Geriatrician Clinical Impression of Frailty
  7. eNon-frailty tools that were used only once
  8. fThe Geriatric Evaluation and Management (GEM) drug study criterion was meeting at least 2 of the following 10 criteria: dependence in at least one activity of daily living, stroke within 3 months, previous falls, difficulty ambulating, malnutrition, dementia, depression, unplanned admission in the last 3 months, prolonged bed rest, or incontinence
  9. gArticles that examined the association of a frailty measure with a longitudinal adverse outcome
  10. hInclusion/Exclusions criterion and outcome measure; risk stratification and outcome measure
  11. iArticles which only used frailty as a descriptive characteristic. For example, if an article used frailty both as an inclusion/exclusion criterion and a descriptive characteristic, it was only categorized as inclusion/exclusion criterion in our review
  12. jMore than one outcome can be examined within each article
  13. kFor example, change in anticoagulant use
  14. lFor example, antibody levels
  15. mAdverse outcomes that were examined only once