Skip to main content

Table 2 Demographic and baseline characteristics of subjects between two groups

From: Effects of resistance training on body composition and functional capacity among sarcopenic obese residents in long-term care facilities: a preliminary study

 

Intervention Group

Comparison Group

χ2/t

p

Gender (M/F)

14/22

21/13

3.660

0.056

Age(yrs.) (SD)

79.64(7.36)

80.15 (8.26)

0.272

0.786

Education (no/yes)

14/22

16/18

0.477

0.490

Religion (no/yes)

8/28

13/21

2.135

0.144

CIRS total (SD)

2.76 (1.20)

2.71 (1.22)

−0.159

0.875

 

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

t

p

Body composition

 Body weight (kg)

59.63 (10.52)

61.19 (8.17)

0.693

0.491

 BMI(kg/m2)

25.15 (3.75)

24.85 (3.01)

−0.364

0.717

 Fat mass (kg)

25.23 (6.76)

24.56 (4.72)

−0.474

0.637

 Fat (%)

42.07 (6.00)

40.29 (6.87)

−1.149

0.255

 Fat free mass(kg)

34.26 (5.99)

36.64 (6.96)

1.235

0.132

 Soft lean mass(kg)

32.33 (5.78)

34.57 (6.67)

1.494

0.140

 Skeletal muscle mass(kg)

17.79 (3.54)

19.09 (4.06)

1.413

0.162

 Skeletal muscle (%)

29.98 (3.44)

31.03 (4.11)

1.155

0.252

 Skeletal muscle index (kg/m2)

7.48 (1.02)

7.68 (1.18)

0.732

0.467

 Lean mass index (kg/m2)

13.61 (1.58)

13.92 (1.87)

0.751

0.455

 ASM (kg)

13.66 (3.43)

14.92 (3.85)

1.437

0.155

 ASM (%)

22.81 (3.31)

24.15 (4.28)

1.465

0.148

 ASMI(kg/m2)

5.72 (1.07)

5.98 (1.19)

0.964

0.338

Physical performance

 aTotal grip strength(kg)

27.29 (13.76)

24.67 (17.34)

0.699

0.487

 aTotal pinch strength(kg)

5.28 (3.02)

4.86 (3.85)

0.507

0.614

 Total FIM score

112.67 (17.89)

82.09 (33.79)

4.692

< 0.001***

 FIM self-care

35.89(9.12)

25.41(12.51)

3.986

< 0.001***

  1. ASM appendicular skeletal muscle mass, ASMI appendicular skeletal muscle mass index, BMI body mass index, CIRS Cumulative Illness Rating Scale, FIM functional independence measure
  2. aTotal grip/pinch strength was summed up from readings of both hands
  3. ***P < 0.001