Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Construct validity of the Dining Environment Audit Protocol: a secondary data analysis of the Making Most of Mealtimes (M3) study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Aug 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sandra Simmons
25 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nobuko Hongu
21 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Heather Keller
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sandra Simmons
13 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Heather Keller
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sandra Simmons
30 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Heather Keller
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
3 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
22 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12877-018-0708-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement