Key stakeholders’ experiences of respite services for people with dementia and their perspectives on respite service development: a qualitative systematic review

Table 3 Summary quality assessment of included studies

First author, year	Phenomena under study	Theoretical framework/orientation	Setting	Sampling/Recruitment	Depth/Breadth of Perspective	Ethics	Data collection	Data analysis	Positionality/Reflexivity	Policy/Practice Implications	Quality assessment
Brataas, 2010 [31]	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	X	√	Medium-High
Cahill, 2003 [32]	√	√	√	X	√	X	X	X	X	√	Low-Medium
de Jong, 2009 [30]	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	X	√	Medium-High
Donath, 2009 [41]	√	√	√	X	X	√	√	X	X	√	Medium
Donath, 2011 [40]	√	√	√	X	X	√	√	X	X	√	Medium
Gilmour, 2002 [36]	√	√	√	X	√	√	√	X	X	√	Medium
Gústafsdóttir, 2014 [22]	√	√	√	√	√	√	X	X	X	X	Medium
Hochgraeber, 2015 [27]	√	√	√	√	√	√	X	√	X	√	Medium-High
Holm, 2003 [29]	√	X	√	X	√	X	X	X	X	√	Low-Medium
Huang, 2016 [28]	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	X	√	Medium-High
Jansen, 2009 [26]	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	X	√	Medium-High
Kirkley, 2011 [38]	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	X	√	Medium-High
McGrath, 2000 [34]	√	√	√	√	X	X	√	√	X	√	Medium
O’Connell, 2012 [20]	√	√	√	√	X	√	√	X	X	√	Medium
Parahoo, 2002 [33]	√	√	√	√	√	X	X	X	X	√	Medium
Perry, 2001 [42]	√	√	√	√	X	X	√	X	X	√	Medium
Phillipson, 2011(IH) [23]	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	X	√	Medium-High
Phillipson, 2011(RR) [24]	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	X	√	Medium-High
Phillipson, 2012(DC) [25]	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	X	√	Medium-High
Robinson, 2012 [21]	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	X	√	Medium-High
Strang, 2000 [37]	√	√	√	X	√	X	√	X	X	√	Low-Medium
Upton, 2005 [35]	√	√	√	X	√	√	X	X	X	√	Medium
Woolrych, 2013 [39]	√	√	√	√	√	X	√	X	X	√	Medium

X = Not Clear/Not Methodologically Sound; √ = Clear/Methodologically Sound
Quality assessment categories: Low-Medium = 6 ≥ X, Medium 3-5X, Medium-High 2 ≤ X

ISSN: 1471-2318