This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Key stakeholders’ experiences of respite services for people with dementia and their perspectives on respite service development: a qualitative systematic review
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 20 June 2017
Accepted: 24 November 2017
Published: 7 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|20 Jun 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sophie Cès|
|8 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kirsten Hermans|
|22 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Emma O' Shea|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kirsten Hermans|
|24 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sophie Cès|
|26 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Emma O' Shea|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Emma O' Shea|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|23 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|7 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12877-017-0676-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.