This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Validation and inter-rater reliability of a three item falls risk screening tool
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 13 July 2016
Accepted: 16 November 2017
Published: 23 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|13 Jul 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Jul 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Catherine Said|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Jul 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Powers|
|26 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Catherine Said|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Catherine Said|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|13 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|16 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|23 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12877-017-0669-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.