Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Clinically significant discrepancies between sleep problems assessed by standard clinical tools and actigraphy

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yukiko Miyazaki
19 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jong-Long Guo
12 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Kjersti Marie Blytt
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Kjersti Marie Blytt
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Kjersti Marie Blytt
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
23 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
27 Oct 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12877-017-0653-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement