Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Social and clinical determinants of preferences and their achievement at the end of life: prospective cohort study of older adults receiving palliative care in three countries

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Judith Rietjens
4 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michal Lynn Boyd
2 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Irene Higginson
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Irene Higginson
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Irene Higginson
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
19 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
23 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12877-017-0648-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement